Other subjects: later.

Scroll down please and the easy / simple descripion about Einstein's Theory of Relativity and more starts (a.o. the easy / simple explanation about gravitational force, but is no force, and how a clock can be running slower, see 2.7)!

*Read in 3.0 there is probably more existing (just Physics, just a new thought), it is hidden in light!

*The speed of light is the greatest speed in the visible universe .. but not in the invisible universe!

*To think in quanta of motion (the most little units in nature) is in fact the same as thinking in a visible and invisible universe, so a coincidence (see in 5.0 + evidence quanta used in theory of Quantum Mechanics by Chinese scientists)!

*Just read (28/4/15) that indeed (as I thought in 3.0) 1 photon is enough to entangle many particles (experiment in March 2015 : thousands of atoms entangled with a single photon, copy link : "http://newsoffice.mit.edu/2015/thousands-atoms-entangled-single-photon-0325"), why don’t see physicists yet the possible connection with the local time 0 of a photon? It is unbelievable that scientists can work on this scale, I would like to see this ever! Is the entanglement of particles a natural function, e.g. for the entangled spins of particles, and is these entanglement by humans an extra entanglement, because the spin is from nature already opposite in situations and is the same channel used for the relocation of elementary particles (so no atoms) in situations (was a radio wave ever also not spooky)? I suppose the measured time is only the time for the spin changing in the visible universe! Yet another interesting copy link (1998) : "http://www.volkskrant.nl/dossier-archief/gedoofd-licht-bestaat-meteen-elders~a458323/" (unfortunately Dutch). Sometimes you can have a right thought without knowing the details (but have not to be right of course), until now I have not read anything that my thought disproves, I only watch it from another corner (without formulas) and can give a result which would be found much later otherwise. All strange effects in the Quantum Mechanics are as I think all effects from a mixed universe without time. It could not be otherwise than that a real physicist know somewhere too that it is all no coincidence (we have the phase of monkey passed)! There is a day coming, we know suddenly much more .. and I hope it will not be only stupid technically but an important step further for the world ..

*Just much read on Wiki (10/7/15) about that particles present themselves also as a wave and many other interesting things about the Quantum Mechanics. Copy link: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality". Looking to an experiment with particles make the results different in that experiment (watch the double slit experiment). That have of course to do with light (own thought). In the entanglement of particles is indeed no time element involved (click within the page on ERP paradox). Outside our universe is the time 0 (click than on Quantum Entanglement and read Mystery of Time, experiment in 2013). Just before Mystery of Time an explanation is given by physicists for the entanglement of photons by using their local times of 0. The time 0 “signals” are coming closer! If more people think in the same way, it proves only the logic! We have reached the limits of science for us!

*Just read (12/8/15) that Chinese scientist already in 2013 have measured the time of info over an entangled connection, and say indeed it can be instantaneous (immediately), so time 0, nice to see your own thoughts confirmed! Copy link "http://www.livescience.com/27920-quantum-action-faster-than-light.html".

*A thought. Maybe is our universe 1 big field presenting a different kind of fields at the same time. Nobody knows in fact exactly what is a field. For light an electromagnetic field, for a specific kind of particles another unknown Quantum Field etc. According the Quantum Mechanics are all particles a mix from as well a wave in a field (a wave is a disturbance in a field) as a particle (a little heap of energy). As if the energy below the maximum and minimum from the wave in the field have used for the particle, as if particle and wave are one entity!

*In 6.0 I am analyzing my own thoughts by studying the Quantum Mechanics (slowly)

*Everybody know/feel if we continue our live as it is today, our world will be end in nothing, maybe successfully for a small group of people (but of course life is currently better than 100 years ago, and many people in this world are trying to improve things!). The balance is gone (we overdo as well mentally as technically, are we going to change slowly to robots ourselves in the next 2000 years?)! Can we change, yes we can, it is not too late! It is all (UN) education for young people (but the problem is that one generation have to initiate this), other people can't change easy anymore (e.g. a strong example, they double / triple the rents / prices for homes for the next generation, their children, just before they leave this world, they waste their money in a short period, a non-reversible situation, in 2050 there are 10 milliard (billion) of people, in a next crisis many will loose their house again etc. etc., the society have to be lucky that the new generation is so tame compared to the years 1970-80, especially the "politically right" thinking people, problems will increase for sure in the future but the previous generation have already left .. I admit the most people are not personally responsible, the greedy / bad ones create this situation but unfortunately most people in the world are followers and weak for money .. it seems that people especially the new generation let lure themselves in a “spider” web without resistance, while the “spider” knows very well to busy with ..).

*Later I will start a seperate page about the UN, what we "the people from this world" can do together, and open a postbox for idea's in case emails do not arrive! I don't want to play a role in that, more for young people (their future), just to start and intervene for an initiative possibly!

*There can be a language problem too with my title. I mean with "From Einstein to The United Nations" from the subject "Einstein" to the subject "United Nations", so it sounds more nice!

*I am not a social media fan (misused to create chaos far from home by very naïve and dangerous unscrupulous people, chaos century after century until ??, I never mean ordinary people as me and you, problems can only be solved by the UN in a long term with the least violence possible (sanctions, blockades, isolation etc. but not misused!), the web and networks generally must also fall under the jurisdiction of the UN with high penalties when misused, the only way to protect dominant people against themselves, they infiltrate in your computers, mobiles, manipulate the web, emails, if it is the normal accepted way these days, what can you do against this brutality, but we had never protests against this brutality, others control us etc., and don’t we have to create rules promptly in the UN how far we may go with robotization, do we make not again a mistake in history, and let we in the EU lure us in a war and how to prevent this (see 6.1)?), but maybe it is time to bring this page to Facebook and perhaps other own social media in the world (I do not know yet but I go to find out). But Google as well as Facebook are regular visitors of the White House, so they are also not independent anymore, and which other social media are independent today .. So don't be afraid, these kind of initiatives (not to be selfish and greedy) mostly die silently! But you have to try before you die and I shall definitely try (in slow steps, without any funds, I refuse to leave this world as a sheep, no offense to sheeps)! The social media can also be used on world level!

Read at the end of this page what you may experience if you should start a UN initiative (and not really started yet, later eventually)!

Easy / simple explanation of Einstein's Theory of Relativity / time dilation / length contraction

After this short insertion "From Einstein to The United Nations" (between lines) starts the explanation (see also summarized in an overall picture at the end of 3.0; at the bottom of this page you find all the other languages for this insertion):

Last new thought (read in 3.0), there is an invisible universe with time 0 only used in situations by particles and (or through) a "high speed or immediate" signal (the hidden "God's?" channel to communicate immediately with everybody and anything in the universe, at least if one discover how to use, can take ages), and a visible universe (Einstein still valid, particles visible here, the same particle even on more places at the same time, and don't make the mistake in formulas to calculate with the distance in the visible universe while the particle was in the invisible universe) .. this invisible universe with time 0 can't exist on its own, only interwoven with the visible universe .. what qualified physicist dare this thought and writes history if everything is truth (think of Mr. Higgs, follow your own thoughts)? .. if you have contacts in the science world, let them look to this idea .. why is Einstein famous, he was using a fact offered by Lorentz (NL) who did not know what to do with it (it was a “confusing” fact, no theory but a hard fact, how more resistance how slower the time, even time 0, took a long time until acceptance) .. the Quantum Mechanics deliver also “confusing” facts (also no theory but hard facts, no resistance at all, time 0, takes also time for acceptance), where is the physicist like Einstein who transforms that hard facts (typically how the brains can work, I really don’t read much about these subjects because too few time because of my work, but I think much about these subjects outside my work, a part of Physics where you can come far with logic, in fact my view on time is fully based on the Lorentz formula, in the night on my balcony on Jan. 2015 smoking a little cigar I got this idea above described suddenly if it was whispered in my ears, I was thinking if there would be a God existing how could he/she controlling the universe with its big distances, a magically moment for myself, but that says nothing of course even it sounds logically, by somewhat reading on the internet covers this idea, what others can have too already, the concept nonlocality in the Quantum Mechanics) .. now I find it myself also being exciting (but not enough time) to discover / read where in the theory “totally no resistance” have sneaked into (or a coincidence?) ..

I have no religious background, I am a humanist. With this possible discovery ever (there is possibly more) the downward spiral from our world can be ended, arrogance and the dominant thought “it goes only about me or my group, about our own self-enrichment, I use my cleverness only for me or my group, this is my only goal in life, after me or my group the deluge, I do everything to reach my goal, via secret means or mass psychology, I give nothing about others in the world but use them only for expanding of power and/or self-enrichment, I want children but have no real interest in their future, to rule over others with own ideas, power is an obsession for me, money is an obsession for me, I don’t rest in my short live before I have just as many money as 10000 people together even it make me not happier and can I do nothing with it etc.”, humans have proven to be able to create everything but somewhere there is no progress. Stimulate the thought to think about the welfare of other people as well as animals, treat both well, stop with primitive behavior and to be cruel (e.g. not throwing living lobsters in boiling oil in the year 2015). Via a strong improved and justified United Nations without veto rights (a world government) and related education (and controlled growth in populations), we can create together a nicer world (by which everybody have to follow the rules of The United Nations for humans and animals e.g. a limitation in personal assets, no exploitation on basic goods as houses, everybody a chance on self-development etc.). Together we are really in a strong position and be able to cope with anything!

This insertion have been translated by myself and checked by volunteer: Régine TEMAM / copy link "http://www.translatorscafe.com/cafe/member211853.htm".

If you have your own thoughts, bring them into the world, by which possibly others get even better thoughts/ideas! The truth is still not known! And if you are wrong, why should you shame yourself, other people don’t know it exactly either. If physicists were able to explain these kind of subjects clearly to not physicists, it was not necessary to start this subject.

Don’t give up immediately during reading, because when you continue you can understand it better and you understand afterwards the previous lines better. It is for the first time of course not really that simple (but more simple than you think)!

It goes here about a general explanation, there can be statements not totally correct for 100% because it is not my specialism (hurry and no enough time), but try to correct as much as possible in between. Remember that also in Physics yet long not all is explicable! Time is an introduced concept of humans themselves to be able to record the sequence of events. I use often in my explanation a moving or traveling clock, but it goes about the motions in the construction itself, that this construction is also a clock have a double function. So with our method to record time we see some strangeness’s, that’s all. There seems to be no method until now to record an universal time, and possibly also impossible because there are locations with time 0. Sometimes people ask me why I publish this all without being a physicist, very simple: exchanging ideas over the internet. Nobody need to read it, that’s a free choice.

All these subjects are going very slow in Physics because there are too few facts. But sometimes you can just have the right thought without knowing all the details. If you are convinced by yourself, you have to try this out. It would even be cowardly not daring to spread this. People can eventually react strange to you (“he thinks to be Einstein” etc.), or to bring you down in another way, but that have always been in the past (unfortunately)!

If I write about Higgs fields, this can also be a kind of Higgs fields (are a kind of energy fields which give a mass or weight to objects and keep objects in place)!

When I write about resistance (is explained at latest), is this the resistance from the Higgs fields because of mass or weight for an object and to keep this on its place, if I write about the extra resistance for high speeds, this is a extra resistance to change the place of an object. This resistance cost no extra energy for a constant speed. If an object have given consciously a specified speed, than have that extra resistance always over won, otherwise the object could not have this speed.

I am writing about resistance and extra resistance to make this more understandable, in fact it is an increasing resistance for higher speeds. This resistance is among others also called gravitational force (is no force, zie 2.7), but mostly another kind of resistance.

Only materials undergo an (extra) resistance, light undergo no resistance and have therefore always the maximum speed which can just not be reached by materials in the Higgs fields.

I keep me to the facts from Physics (enough known but not all, I have not studied Physics, but I have a Mathematics background), but I present my own interpretations according my own thoughts. Relativity is no magic and is understandable in a Newton way! If I think something what others already think, I cannot check that, in each case not read somewhere else in this way, it goes me purely about the truth (and I claim nothing, and do I think nonsenses, I don't care).

The Higgs fields form the dimension Time!

In fact we accept everything around us as it is, how “strange” it looks, that is the same for the Theory of Relativity!

The truth about everything is already certain for millions of years, only we don't know it all yet!

Table of Contents:

1.1 Short summary (for whom is in hurry, in 2.1 starts the longer version, meanwhile both equally in length)
1.2 Examples
1.3 Resistance
1.3a Speed of light always measured constantly, made clearly visible (own thought)
1.4 Time Travelling
1.5 Summarised and personal thought (most logical I think)
1.6 E = m.c²
1.7 Thinking in more dimensions (> 3)

2.1 General
2.2 Time and distances (space)
2.3 Time dilation
2.4 Length contraction
2.5 Relativity
2.6 Symmetry and simultaneity
2.7 Easy / simple explanation about gravitational force (but is no force) and how a clock can be running slower
2.8 Gravitational waves

3.0 My own thoughts about our universe (why the speed of light is always constant, follow a curved path because of the gravitational "force" or the Higgs fields, why particles can be on 2 places at the same time, possibly direct communication with everyone and anything in our universe etc., the existance of an invisible universe with time 0 near the visible universe but Einstein is still valid, photons which pass the time 0 + summarized in an overall picture)

4.0 Parallel worlds and own opinion

5.0 Quantum Mechanics and own opinion

6.0 Conclusion: My own hypotheses

6.1 Have the time 0 “signal” a time 0 or an unlimited great speed, and do we live in a programmed world, we can never understand it completely, it is most logical there must be more (own thoughts)?

7.0 Last thought for which the text on this page must be updated

1.1 Short summary (for whom is in hurry, in 2.1 starts the long version)

Anyone have always interest in mysterious subjects going further than daily life. For me personally these are currently our brains, the possible existence of parallel worlds and Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. I have not studied Physics but have a Mathematics background so I can follow these subjects slowly as long there are not too much formulas, because otherwise I loose also my interest. I see it as a challenge to explain such subject to others in a simple way, so that my effort is not only selfish (“if I understand it only”). This is also a blog for me to pick up the subject after a while. I have been busy with the subject after my work for 3 years (not continued of course) since 2011 to understand this theory (it costs much time) , and I believe it is time to finish this subject because it is no mystery anymore for myself (unfortunately). I see it as an extension of Newton (or in fact our Christian Huygens (NL)). If parallel worlds can be exist, this shall be a mystery of course. Let's read this subject next near the theory about our brains (and reading about self-learning electronic neural networks). It is all very interesting stuff about the secrets of life. I like it very much to write about my own vision later (a.o. it fascinates me very highly that scientists want to prove that complex life by itself and with great coincidence after coincidence have originated from dead material, with other words we are absolute nothing, a kind of robots, and that must give an strange satisfying explanation about our existence, in any case lacking in imagination. But ok, if this would be possible through “self-organization” possibly available in nature, the next question arises again where is this coming from etc. I think finally Physics shall open gates to discoveries with a total other vision we could think about, possibly our brains must be more developed first to understand these abstract discoveries better, for example see our space originated in a single point in the fourth dimensional space, like a flat area in the three dimensional space. But even in this last case other mysteries should exist for ever in our lives!).

E-mails to discuss my explanation will be removed immediately. Discussions are possible on physics forums worldwide (e.g. in the USA are big forums with many experts, physicists with a degree, who are willing to answer your questions). A very good forum is (I think the best in the world): copy link "https://www.physicsforums.com". Only e-mails (see webmaster at the bottom of this page) with ideas about an UN project / initiative will be read once a month in a secured environment, emails with attachments will be removed unread.

Einstein’s Theory of Relativity short summarized:

Very short: if an object/signal have a constant speed and one have attached a clock to that object, that clock goes running slower, in other words, the time goes slower on that location. For new motions with a constant speed originated on that location, the time goes slower the same, passing motions with a constant speed originated in other locations (with different constant speeds) are observed on that location also slower (a motion effect, so I mean you can observe speeds greater, e.g. to pass an object in motion in opposite direction, but the difference in speed is observed slower with relativity than without relativity). Because materials can never reach the speed of light, a clock always runs and points therefore never to the time 0. In a black hole can the time be 0 in a single point, but a clock can not exist there.

If there is being spoken about time, this means the time read from our clock here on Earth or the time our clock in motion presents to us (where our clock in motion may be). Our clock is made (mechanical or digital) on the fact our Earth turns in 24 hours around its axes (the sun arises and goes down). Times are reading on a clock for us standing still. So see the time in this relation not as something mysterious, but normally as the time reading from a clock made by ourselves.

So we measure motion with a clock, in this case the rotation of the earth, if no motions would exist we could not even made a clock. For example a person walks from A to B and took 1 hour. So during rotation of the Earth for 1 hour (that registers our clock) that person moved from A to B. Speed is the travelled distance from a motion from A to B divided by the passed time on our clock. We go to see now how the ration is between that motion and the motion in a clock (so that is speed). As you see later, motions undergo an extra resistance, only for light is the travelled distance divided by the passed time always the same, so as we measure the speed of light (greatest speed possible) anybody elsewhere in the universe (other worlds) is measuring the same speed (but one uses there very likely other units of course for the meter and second, so there must be a recalculation first), for lower speeds this is different.

Consider our Earth as a system travelling through space with a constant speed (I don’t mean its rotation in this case) on which various motions with a constant speed occur originated on Earth (e.g. a clock, train, light etc.). Such system could also be a train with a constant speed in which motions with constant speeds occur originated in that train etc.

Now it turns out in Physics that if such system travels faster with a constant speed, all motions with constant speeds go slower originated in that system. With other words, that motions undergo a extra resistance from something and go slower. Because a travelling clock with that system have also motions inside, all that motions go slower by which the clock is running slower. Even the motions in a living being go slower, so a living being could getting older under these circumstances because the determination go slower.

Personal thought: objects are kept in place by the Higgs fields (see the Higgs fields as a kind of invisible very light syrup around us), I think how faster a system through the Higgs fields travels, how more the motions in that system undergo extra resistance (in all directions), so it cost more kinetic energy for such system to reach a specified speed, compared with the situation the system travelled slower trough the Higgs fields (this speed have determined with a clock “standing still”). So for the same energy belonging to a motion inside the system that motion is going slower (that speed is determined by a clock “standing still” there but travelling with the speed of the system, so running slower; the kinetic energy is ½ . m . v² (shortened formula), but the mass is increasing by extra resistance). For every level of extra resistance, only max. 299.999,999999km can be overbridged per slower second determined by the Higgs fields. Light (is no material with Higgs parts) undergo no resistance and have therefore always the max. speed of 300.000km per (slower) second.

This reduction factor have calculated by our physicist Lorentz (NL) and gives a time delay in the faster travelling system compared to the slower travelling system. This have called time dilation in Physics and these factor is only important for great differences in speed (e.g. 1/10 of the speed of light etc.), so can be ignored in daily life.

Now it turns also when an observer in the slower system observes an object in the faster system, the object is observing shorter in the travelling direction of the system (inside the systems the objects have the same size because sizes does not change, there is only a time dilation). This have called length contraction in Physics and is the consequence of measurements in systems with another speed than the own system (motion effects because of time dilation). Only perpendicular on the travelling direction of the system is no length contraction, and measurements will be the same seen from both systems. With formulas the length contraction can be recalculated to the real size. Personal thought: Two different times in one direction gives a shorter image = normal image * time dilation for the observer (humans/devices).

Measuring persons in the faster system have no idea from time dilation, only observers from another system with a different speed can observe this.

Light from a faster system, so in which the time goes slower, will be observed in another system with Doppler Effect meaning the frequency of light is different observed. Think at the red (traveling deeper in space) and blue stars (travelling towards to us) we see.

So in the faster system goes the time (is clock) and motions slower, but also the objects/signals coming from the slower system (so going faster) are seen slower within the faster system (a motion effect).

Personal thought: one sees the path of motion for an object from another system in the own system in that way, if that motion with the same kinetic energy stored in that object, in the own system would be originated. Energy is an absolute value.

The most difficult: this is the most special at the Theory of Relativity (and very clever seen by Einstein), in fact from all discoveries. Personally I find it still logical. It goes about what an observer observers and this can be different for other observers. E.g. an observer sees the front of a house and another observer the back, they can’t see at the same time the front and back. Or e.g. an observer sees another observer far away as a little person (perspective), but the same is truth the other way around. Above an observer sees the time slower in the other system (the moving clock runs slower), the observer sees length contraction in the other system and the observer sees the Doppler Effect for light coming from the system with slower time.
Because the time goes slower in 2 directions, the observer in the system with slower time sees the same effects the other way around in the other system, that system goes also faster with regard to the observer. If this observer would move a clock into the direction of the other system, this clock would also running slower (and more slower than the observers clock which already runs slower). So the exchange of info (signals, objects) the other way around undergo also extra resistance. So the calculation with times is for every observer different.
If you want to see all clocks at the same time in your thoughts, remember all clocks are different and therefore give other times, 1 clock can give 1 time. Each clock covered another path of motions. Because the clocks are running different for both observers, the concept simultaneity is also different for both. If clocks are synchronized in one system, these are not synchronized seen from the other system. Therefore the name Theory of Relativity, all is relative to the observer.
See the examples below, possibly it is going more clear. Is this all truth ? By using this way of thinking for GPS satellites, so seen from any direction, they work more precise now. Also an atom clock (precise clock) in an airplane over a great distance, is running slower. And e.g. a muon (is a specific physical particle) have a fixed duration for existence. How higher the speed of the muon, how slower the disintegration, so it exists longer for an observer.

Personal thought: if a system travels in the one direction or the other through the Higgs fields, there is always a extra resistance for the motions within the systems. Think for example at a container filled with gas, in all directions the pressure (or resistance) is the same. An observer sees an object/signal coming from the other direction slower because the time in the other direction goes faster seen from the observer. If the observer sends an object/signal to the other direction, the observer at the other side sees it slower. So time is going slower in each direction. You can’t use 1 clock (your local clock) for both directions for high differences in speeds to exchange times (results would be false), how depends on the situation (see later and possibly by recalculations). In practice this all is difficult to test because of the low differences in speeds. But a clock in motion runs slower. The time is going slower in each direction you look, so means, for an object/signal what you send.

Possibly more clear: so generally how faster something goes, how more extra resistance experienced. This is also the case within systems it selves. E.g. without Einstein/Lorentz (so Newton) two speeds could be added or subtracted. With Einstein/Lorentz the sum of two speeds gives a (bit) lower speed (because there is more extra resistance, cost more kinetic energy than available), and for the subtraction a (bit) greater speed (because there is lesser extra resistance, there is more kinetic energy available).

Light: the speed of passing light (the greatest speed possible) emitted in a system and seen from a travelling clock is always equal (is c or called the speed of light). For other objects with lower speeds is this speed not equal, unless the object have the same speed as the clock (speed of object always 0).

In Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity only constant speeds are handled, so constant motions. Above handles the Special Theory. In Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity also accelerations are handled, but the basics of extra resistance is the same, only the formulas will be more complex. Also the concept gravitational force is different seen (is no force, see 2.7). Above is the extra resistance equally divided in a system. Because of a heavy mass in space is that extra resistance around the mass not equal anymore and fall objects to that mass by following the path with the most less extra resistance (one speaks about curved space). So passing light around a star follows not a straight line, but follows a path in the Higgs fields (see an idea in 3.0).
According the General Theory of Relativity there must be so called gravitational waves generated when two heavy masses in space turns around each other. These gravitational waves cause fluctuations in the extra resistance, for which during passing a local clock would go slower/faster, because the extra resistance is not equally divided anymore in that case. One tries to prove this currently with detectors for laser light, see more in 2.8 Gravitational waves and my own thoughts about it.

It may be clear that it is impossible to register an universal time with our equipment as consequence from time dilation in all directions. We can therefore only work with times seen from our own system, the Earth, and using for history. Somewhere in the universe this shall not be different for other Earth’s. But recalculations are possible when the difference in speeds is known. But when the difference is not very great, time dilation have to be ignored.

Personal thought: I think in one of two systems the time is really going slower and living beings will be older. But it can’t be specified which system goes faster if you were not there. But if you consider two systems with equal speed and one uses energy for the second system to go faster in its travelling direction, the time will be going slower in the second system. But for recalculations between the two systems is not important in which system the time is really going slower, because time dilation works in both directions for the exchange of objects and signals.

Personal thought: if ever science can eliminate the (extra) resistance (time dilation) when the knowledge is there, materials can travel great distances in short time (our time). For humans this is not a good idea because time is going faster, also the determination in our bodies. Possibly there are places in the universe where the (extra) resistance is lesser, e.g. lesser concentration of Higgs fields (around the Earth, black hole, around stars etc.). E.g. in fact gravitational waves prove, one can influence this (extra) resistance.

If the time dilation can be ignored in most cases, demonstrable experiments being difficult because of great speed differences, why we worry about. Firstly because Physics try to find the truth, and secondly this theory have led to the important Einstein formula e = m .c². Besides GPS satellites work more precise now.

1.2 Examples

Examples need not be difficult as long as you understand that there is a difference between a moving clock (clock goes slower, you compare the time or clock with the location coming from or when returning) or to see a motion from a different (moving) location from standing still for which your clock is standing still for you (so own location). The Lorentz formula for the reduction factor (time dilation) is for both situations (as long as the speeds of motions are constant).


light signal L1 to the right emitted on Earth from light source, 300.000 km long and takes 1 second in our time and have the greatest speed possible existing (300.000 km / second)


how sees one this light signal L2 in motion, e.g. from a travelling clock (same type e.g. digital) to the right, so from the light source off ?
suppose the time on that clock goes 0,8 slower, the meters light passing locally is 300.000 km x 0,8 on the same moment, but after the slower going second again 300.000 km so the local speed of light is still the same, meanwhile there is more light send than seen, so if the time goes slower you see light slower passing


if one sees the same meters passing light in a slower going second while because of the own movement the distance meanwhile between de light source have increased, is imaginable that the light waves larger are observed with other words one sees a lower frequency as observer


if one would travel with the clock the other way around, to the left, towards the light source, one sees after the slower going second the same meters passing light while because of the own movement the distance meanwhile between de light source have decreased, is imaginable that the light waves shorter are observed with other words one sees a higher frequency as observer


it is to understand if nature have specified the greatest speed possible, that in motion this speed not greater can be observed


in case of light in a slower going second, travels emitted light still 300.000km per slower second, but also will light not locally emitted (from a faster time) observed with the same slowness (besides totally smaller observed and on top of that changes it’s frequency for the observer)


so it is imaginable if one from a travelling clock to the right a motion observed with a lower speed that because of the extra resistance this object is observed with a (little) greater speed than the speed differences (normally subtracted), and the other way around a (little) lower speed (normally added)


If one receives light on the own location from different moving locations (e.g. stars), that light come slower to us because seen from the own location our own clock would be going faster in that different locations. One sees this light therefore with different frequencies, so can one calculate the speed difference between the own location and that star (in the own time expressed of course). So no clocks needed in this case.


p1 --> p2,p3

p1 <-- p3

persons p2/p3 travel with a constant speed to the right, off from person p1, time dilation 1/10 (about 0,995 x speed of light), clocks set equally on start at 14:00:00, p1 send light (1 photon or a pulse) to persons p2/p3 at the same time when p2/p3 leave, and is received after 200 seconds as 20 local seconds, when the time at p1 is 14:03:20, it is for p2/p3 14:00:20. If p3 travels back to p1 with time dilation 1/20 at 14:00:20, than it is at p2 (there left p3 and all wear a watch) after 20 local seconds 14:00:40 and at p3 14:00:21. After a while arrived at p1 and watch p3 is behind at p1. This example makes it clearly that the time difference is not to see on the clock at p1, but only on the travelling clock from p3 (and for many other examples there is even no clock in motion, would you use the clock from p1 for exchanging times, this would give false results unless recalculations are used).

Remark: light have always the same speed, but the shape (totally) of light from a faster time changes seen by an observer in a slower time, it is smaller (on top of that changes it’s frequency) .. compare with length contraction for objects in motion ..

1.3 Resistance

So on a location where the time is going slower because of the extra resistance travels emitted light in that location also 300.000km per slower second, so the speed of light is always the same. Passing light from another location with another time will be observed too with the same speed of light (see example above, is imaginable) but slower seen (besides totally smaller observed and on top of that changes it’s frequency for the observer).

Other motions than light originated on that location go in ratio compared with a location where the time is going faster, the same (only slower). Because a local clock and the motion itself undergo the same extra resistance. A motion originated in another location with another time, will be observed in contrast of light (lower speeds) with different speeds. Because separable speed components may not anymore be pure added or subtracted. Normally (without extra resistance) would you see the pure difference in speed. But as well as the motion related to that pure speed difference, as the motions in the local clock undergo extra resistance, but not proportional. This as a consequence from more or less available kinetic energy.

A motion originated in a specified time in a system (compare e.g. with the beginning point (time 0) where our universe have originated, do you see in another system with another speed always slower, for the same available kinetic energy (because the time goes slower in every direction).

What could be that extra resistance ?

Personal thought: I think the Higgs fields. Higgs fields keep an object in place, if the constant speed increases, an object is keeping in place proportional, but it seems there is a extra resistance to change that place for a higher constant speed. It is no friction because in space there is no lost of kinetic energy for a constant speed. As a system S2 starting from an identical system S1 in the own time have a higher constant speed, than that extra resistance have over won by more kinetic energy for building up of that constant speed, but constant motions originated inside S2 (like in a clock, under the same circumstances as in S1) undergo more extra resistance (because have also an own constant speed) and go therefore slower. Probably the Higgs fields give (extra) resistance but no friction because they cannot take kinetic energy.

What is the difference between two same speeds in a system with faster time and a slower time ?

It cost lesser kinetic energy compared, in the system with slower time to reach that speed (to over bridge that distance) because all is going slower. But don’t forget the speed in the slower system is calculated in a slower time (1 second takes longer, recalculated a lower speed in the system with faster time). This fits also in living longer in a slower going time.

But the concentration of Higgs fields on location can be different in systems through Physics processes by which the extra resistance varies (around the Earth, black hole, around stars etc.). When the extra resistance is lesser, motions in systems go faster, so a clock goes faster. But it is always be valid probably in the Higgs fields, that also for a faster second 300.000km can be overbridged for light.

1.3a Speed of light always measured constantly, made clearly visible (own thought)

I show the travelled distance for 1 meter / local second for different reduction factors at the same moment (1, 0.8, 0.6 en 0.4), below the travelled distance for the whole slower second, the first second is from the own system (our clock time).





So if 1 second have passed in our time, there is compared 0.8s, 0.6s or 0.4 second passed in the slower going system. If there is a whole slower second passed, there is in our time 1/0.8=1.25s, 1/0.6=1.66s and 1/0.4=2.5 second passed. Then there is 1 meter distance travelled in the slower going system.
The Higgs fields allow for each slowness in the local second that max. 300.000km can be overbridged, so that is the max. speed.
Material have Higgs parts inside and therefore undergo resistance in the Higgs fields, but for each resistance a new originated motion is possible, therefore the max. relative speed is never reached because there would no new motion possible anymore.
Light have no Higgs parts, different build up, undergo no resistance and have always the max. speed possible in the Higgs fields.

1.4 Time Travelling

So the time goes in all directions slower in systems or from passing signals/objects from other systems. If something special is needed to travel in time, you can only enter a system what in your own time is fired fast (slower is not possible), within that system everything goes slower, if you return after a long time the others are older and the environment changed probably. So with time traveling you can only miss a nice time.

1.5 Summarised and personal thought (most logical I think)

“Local time” as existing as on our Earth and others (the rate of a clock or called our time) is determined through the path of all motions and the (extra) resistance which have led to this motion of our Earth from the beginning point (time 0) our universe have originated. This is true for all “local times” for each system/object. Generally: the “local time” for a system/object is determined through the path of all motions and the extra resistance which have led to this motion for the system/object from the beginning point (time 0) our universe have originated. So you can have e.g. 2 systems/objects with a speed to each other with the same “local time”, but the extra resistance (time dilations) for motions (in 2 directions) originated in that systems/objects are valid seen from that “local times” (starting points). In practice must be specified very precise how the calculation of the time dilations will be per situation by determining the path of all motions because of “local times” (this can be the previous motion). In space Lorentz can be used for constant speeds when the extra resistance is equally divided (Special Theory of Relativity), e.g. around our Earth is this different because the extra resistance varies (General Theory of Relativity).
In the average case a system/object S2 in motion have originated from a system/object S1 in motion with its “local time”. In S2 the time will be going really slower and to express in time from S1. Motions originated in S2 direction S1, will be going more slower.
In the beginning point (time 0) the speed of light is born and travels 300.000 km / second for the duration of the local born second. That speed is determined because of the Higgs fields I think. Other objects/speeds are born and for every speed, time goes slower because of the extra resistance of the Higgs fields. 300.000km / local second can always be overbridged in the Higgs fields, so the speed of light, because undergo no resistance.
One sees the path of motion for an object from another system in the own system in that way, if that motion with the same kinetic energy stored in that object, in the own system would be originated. Energy is an absolute value.
Relativity is correct I think but only seen from the beginning point our universe have originated, so the total energy (included the kinetic energy) of objects, local time, path of motions etc. But observers see through different speeds in respect to each other’s things different, but things which are really existing seen from the beginning point of our universe .. probably sees one the increase in slowness or kinetic energy from 1 of both ..

1.6 E = m.c²

(m = massa or weight, v = speed, c = speed of light)
This formula is in fact E = γ . m . c² and means all available energies added inside and outside an object, so also the energy stored into the atom kernels, and so also the kinetic energy. This formula is found from the relativistic laws for keeping energy and impulse, and are the same for lower speeds as we known them. Also Maxwell have contributed with his found formula for energy and impulse of light. It all means that mass is a form of energy.
The kinetic energy for lower speeds is ½ . m . v² and than is the total energy E = m . c² (γ = 1).
For higher speeds is γ > 1 and increases the kinetic energy, e.g. for a speed ½ . c (half of light speed) is this energy 10x greater (dus 5 . m. v (= ½ . c)²).
The force (General Theory of Relativity) necessary to reach this constant speed, is greater in the direction of motion than perpendicular on that direction, so you think immediately at the length contraction (not there perpendicular on the direction of motion).
So just a clock goes slower in all directions seen from an observer, also the kinetic energy increases for all systems/objects seen from an observer, but the energy from all materials (total energy atom kernels) is equally for anybody and that is m . c².

Personal thought : so how faster an object goes how more extra resistance. Gives no friction of the Higgs fields in space, so energy is kept in the form of kinetic energy. New motions (or already there inside the system/object) go slower (also inside a clock). These undergo (extra) resistance in the Higgs fields in all directions. There is no friction but only (extra) resistance. There is lesser force needed perpendicular on that motion direction to reach the speed v for material, because perpendicular you go from 0 to v, so the resistance difference is on lower levels, in the motion direction you go from v1 to v2 so difference v but the resistance difference is on higher levels. But the same time dilation for both.
The Higgs fields form the dimension Time! I would think that the rest mass m, must be the mass from the moment the material have formed. By motions is there kinetic energy added and is a translation from the resistances in the path of motions. So the “local time” for a clock have determined like on our Earth.
γ . m is the mass + extra kinetic energy seen from an observer. Energy is an absolute value. So m must be the rest mass included the kinetic energy already stored from previous motions seen from the beginning point our universe have originated. But because the energy in the atom kernels is so great in value, this kinetic energy is just a small part, so difficult to prove. You understand me already, I personally don’t believe for 100% in relativity. It seems not to be correct totally when you consider “local time”. But .. I personally think that all kinetic energy is already stored in the rest mass (as we know it on Earth) and then is all correct again ..

1.7 Thinking in more dimensions (> 3)

I have for the Higgs fields not the feeling yet to think at a separate fourth dimension, maybe later when I go to read about parallel worlds (Quantum Mechanics / String Theory). But .. see also 3.0

Personally I think, that with thinking in more dimensions (> 3) solutions for problems are postponed because that is never to check, I think all solutions are just found in our universe, but both possibilities are “strange” of course, but you have to accept something as long as our brains can’t understand it all ..

2.1 General

Read 1.1-7 first because 1.1-7 have written later with more knowledge!

Since the idea there can be existing parallel worlds, I am being interested (curious) in the Theory of Relativity to understand slowly what one currently knows or thinks to know.

Because I find it meaningless only to understand this difficult theory for myself, I will try to explain on my website, what I understand, more easily to others, who don’t have enough time to read books but want also to know. And of course is this also a blog for myself, so I can continue the subject again after a while. Especially in the beginning, you can make many mistakes in thinking.

Because I haven't enough time left either, this will go slowly, but I can make a start now because I was busy already for many weeks with discussions on forums to understand the basics. If you want to explain something, you have to be sure if you do it in the right way and not telling the untruth. Sometimes I make errors in my explanation but will be corrected after a while.

I shall explain constantly subjects needed to understand a next subject. I shall use formulas as less as possible and when needed pictures. I shall not go to try to be completed because it must be readable all the time.
For who look critical to my explanation, I shall give an extra explanation sometimes in addition (click on the link after the yellow little bulb , the link after this little bulb is in fact for who already know something about the Theory of Relativity).

My own thoughts about time, space, speed of light, speed greater speed of light etc. can be read by clicking on the link after the red little bulb (or the text is already placed there).

E-mails to discuss my explanation will be removed immediately. Discussions are possible on physics forums worldwide (e.g. in the USA are big forums with many experts, physicists with a degree, who are willing to answer your questions). A very good forum is (I think the best in the world): copy link "https://www.physicsforums.com". Only e-mails (see webmaster at the bottom of this page) with ideas about an UN project / initiative will be read once a month in a secured environment, emails with attachments will be removed unread.

2.2 Time and distances (space)

Light is in fact an electromagnetic wave (can be produced by humans) and can be showed like in figure 1 and 2 below. Compare with a water wave. Light exists out a row of small energy-packets, called photons. So it is a wave in an electromagnetic field (a wave is always a disturbance in a field) and exists at the same time out a row of small energy-packets, called photons, so a mix from wave and photons. For now only the speed of light is important in my explanation.

I find it important too, to explain how you must see light (was my problem in the beginning when I was reading parts from the good Dutch book "De sublieme eenvoud van relativiteit" from professor Sander Bais, NL). If you move and switch on a hand lantern (called a light source) which light shines up, the light particles (photons) in your moving direction have the same speed as you have, so the beam goes with you. But light from other sources you can pass.

Because the Theory of Relativity is based on the fact that the measured speed of light (specified by c in physics) is always constant, independent from the speed of your own motion, I go to use the light itself in my explanation to make something clear. So if you measure the speed of light while you are standing still, or measure the speed of light while you are standing in a truck which have a speed of 80 km/hour, always one find the same speed of light c. How you can measure the speed of light, I do not explain that now. But the speed of light is about 300.000 km/second.

The physicist Maxwell have mathematically proved that the speed of light must be always constant (and C) and independent from your own speed of motion. It is a misunderstanding that Einstein have found everything by his own, but have bundled the existing knowledge in his Theory of Relativity and added own found formulas.

Terms as time and distance have only a meaning in a relative way. One measure time and distance (or length) always related to a point of reference. E.g. Amsterdam is 500 km from Paris or Amsterdam-Paris is 500 km, it is e.g. 02:00 pm means the earth have rotated a specific distance around his axes since its position on 00:00 hours.

We have introduced the units meter and second on earth and can measure time and distance via a clock and ruler during standing still. With these defined units we found that c (speed of light) is about 300.000 km/second. We can say now too, 1 second is the time light travels the distance of 300.000 km further, and the travelled distance of light for 300.000 km represents 1 second. We can now use light itself as ruler (via time) and as clock (via its travelled distance). If we use light as a clock, or use a digital clock, both measure the same time.

Now we can ask ourselves, how time and distance will be measured with our units meter and second (determined when standing still) when moving with a constant speed compared to standing still. E.g. suppose another planet in space moving with a constant speed off our own earth and doing measurements there like on our own earth with our own defined units (clock and ruler). This makes our view easier, but is valid for all motions compared to standing still on our earth (e.g. for a moving person compared to a person standing still etc.).
2.3 Time dilation

First, what is time in fact? The rotation of the Earth have we called 24 hours, we have developed a clock which can point to any moment in these 24 hours. So our time is just a motion with a constant speed. In each kind of clock that motion is followed in 24 hours. In de Theory of Relativity we see e.g. if an object in which motions occur with a constant speed, moves with a higher constant speed, these motions inside go slower. So a moving clock goes slower or time goes slower. Why these motions inside go slower must be explained yet somewhere in the future!

We know now for any constant speed, the measured speed of light is always c. So the ration travelled distance / time of light is always c. We still don't know about the distance or time it selves, but we know that ration is always constant.

Time dilation is the most difficult term of the Theory of Relativity but is just nature, so it is just a case of accepting as you are used with measuring time and distances. If you would learn it when being a child, you would not know better.

This term have to do that time progresses different for the one or the other, the difference in time (expressed in our time units) is called time dilation. 1 second for the one have a different duration as for the other by motion. Now I go to try explaining this in an easy way.

Shortly will be explained that the duration of a second become greater (time goes slower). The meter is for everybody the same meter (seen locally), but the length of a moving object will be measured shorter in its moving direction by an observer standing still (not height or width), so e.g. a moving meter stick of 1 meter will be shorter measured with a local meter stick (this is called length contraction, and is an ordinary motion effect, so you must correct your measurement to know the real length of a moving meter stick, just 1 meter). To observe these differences, you must be able to compare this to duration and length you are used to. So only an observer can see these differences, you self are not aware if the duration of a second changes (become greater). It is also important to explain, each observer sees an object what really is there, but can see an object different or can be seen (think at the length of a moving object). E.g. two observers look to the front and back of a building, but they can’t see the front and back at the same time. So observes see things different.

Suppose you are standing still and measure with a special device the meters train passing at a station. If you run with a constant speed in the train's direction, you will see passing lesser meters of train per second with you special device because of your own motion.

Now I go to use 1 sentence to explain time dilation to remember easily, not correct exactly but will be explained again in more exact details after :

see the passing light in thought as the passing time when standing still (travelled distance of light), if you run with a constant speed in the direction's light, you will see lesser light passing (travelled distance of light), with other words the time goes slower for you.

Now in details and for which it will be made exactly correct.

See the passing light in thought as the passing time when you are standing still. After e.g. 1 second is the travelled distance of light c x 1 km (speed of light x time). Now run with a constant speed in the direction's light, you will see the passing light going slower in thought, but that is impossible because the speed of light is c at any moment. So to make this possible, by nature, the clock will be running slower (probably a watch in this case), so the speed of light will be c again, so finally is during your running in the same 1 second when standing still, the travelled distance of light lesser by the reduction factor. If you recalculate the travelled distance to time, you will find a lower time. If two equal moments (e.g. for person 1 who is standing still, and you as moving person 2) are giving a different time, the moment with the lowest time will have a time dilation with other words moving compared to standing still will give a time dilation (time goes slower, while running takes lesser time than standing still for 1 second). Other clocks are comparable with light (time is time), so moving clocks are running slower. Only an observer can see these changes, not you self (an observer can compare 2 clocks, one standing still and one in motion).

In fact all motions travelling with you during your movement undergo more of a kind of extra resistance than standing still. So a moving clock with you runs slower. The passing light, originated in another system and again speed c with a local clock, have as the only motion in the universe the property that its speed in each other system is seen as C (motion effect). Don’t forget, you measure always the time with a clock standing still for you.

For clearness. For an observer standing still runs a moving clock slower from the other moving person, also the observer measures the length (here width) from the moving person shorter in the moving direction (a motion effect). But for the moving person self runs the time slower, but 1 meter stick standing still have the same length (e.g. the moving person carries a meter stick) as a meter stick standing still for the observer.

Figure 1 (slower system)
So we look now as an observer standing still to the moving other. Suppose you are doing measurements with your own meter stick to the moving other. Everything will be shorter in length around you what is moving (not what is standing still for the observer), but in fact it is difficult to see for movements (only for high speeds and from far away). E.g. a moving ruler will be seen shorter in length, the units are shorter than when standing still (in the moving direction). A moving clock will run slower and being shorter too (in the moving direction). Compare light wave, ruler and clock in figure 2 with figure 1. E.g. 1 cm from figure 1 (standing still) have been 0,9 cm in figure 2 (moving), so also the time. E.g. 1 second from figure 1, is 0,9 second in figure 2, so 1 second in figure 2 would be 1,11 second in figure 1, time in figure 2 is running slower. Distance and time in figure 2 in these examples are expressed in unit’s cm and second from figure 1. The units second and cm in figure 2, so during movement, have been shorter. The clock have been shorter in figure 2 (take care: in length but it looks at high speeds as an depressed accordion shape, height and width are being the same), but the time is also running slower, a "second" in figure 2 is a part of a second in figure 1, so the clock in figure 2 is running slower. . So a slower going time by the moving other, have seen by the observer as a slower running clock and a shorter length in the moving direction (here width, think again about what the observer saw at the building, observers sees things different). You self as the moving other does not see these things, for you are distances (length) and time for everything what moves with you (standing still for you), normally as used. Suppose you are on a different planet which moves with a higher speed than our earth.

Only the observer who is standing still, will calculate time is running slower for the moving one. In this way time corrections can be made for a GPS satellite via calculations.

The Dutch physicist Lorentz had found the formula for the reduction factor. Thanks to Lorentz and Maxwell, Einstein came on the idea of the Theory of Relativity. This reduction factor will be very small at high speeds (for motions), so in normal life with much lower speeds we can ignore the reduction factor.

Figure 2 (faster system)
From the formula of Lorentz for the reduction factor follows too that the speed of an object can never be the speed of light, only close to it. Sounds logically, if you would have the same speed as light, time would be standing still. More worse a person would not survive that, nothing would move anymore in your body, so not your heart too.

Under special circumstances, later I will handle that further, you can go slower older than when standing still, and so you will stay younger because time is going slower.

In CERN (the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland) is indeed proved for the speed of rotating particles that it's speed can be close to the speed of light (by adding energy and adding energy) but never equal to it.

2.4 Length contraction

Figure 3 (effect length contraction)
We consider an observer in his own system with a normal running clock and a train standing still. We consider the running train with a constant speed as the second system in which the clock is running slower. The train itself is also an object in this second system (in this case standing still in this second system it selves) and is seen shorter by the observer when the speed is high of the second system (so the running train). This is called length contraction.

Everything is going slower in this second system with a fixed reduction factor calculated by Lorentz, the clock and constant motions compared with the first system. When we let move with a constant speed an electric contact perpendicular on the running train, the observer is not seeing this shorter because it is perpendicular on the travelling direction of the second system, so no length contraction. The motion of the electric contact will be slower than when the train is standing still in the first system. With this reduction factor runs the clock slower and are all other motions slower in the second system.

Perpendicular on the running train we see only 1 time, the slower going time in the second system. In the travelling direction we have two times, the normal time related with the speed of the second system (also time from the first system) and the slower going time within the second system. If on a second parallel rail a same train is parked (standing still), the observer can see this train (normal length) + the shorter running passing train. Personal thought: Because there must be created an image (for humans or devices as observers) at the same moment from the train standing still and the running train while the time for the running train goes slower (also for signals, light etc.), the image from the running train is shorter (normal image of the train standing still * reduction factor).
2.5 Relativity

So time and distance have only meanings compared to a point of reference, both are relative terms.

So we can only express the progress of time for a moving object (e.g. a person) compared to an object standing still. Without a point of reference distance and time have no meaning.

Now the question could be asked, what specifies the duration of 1 second on our earth or the travelled distance of light in 1 second (relative seen this duration of 1 second will increase by a higher constant speed, but any passing light from somewhere, presents the same time to us via it's travelled distance)?

Don't forget that we selves have defined our 1 second on earth as a specific duration. The speed of light is always c (specified by nature) and measured with our own defined 1 second. We can only compare our 1 second with our clock in a different location somewhere in space. In that case we are busy again relative because the other location have a relative constant speed compared to our earth. Probably is in the beginning point (time 0) from our universe the speed of light born and travels 300.000 km / second for the duration of the local born second.

Now the question could be asked, why do we see size as we do on earth e.g. the size of a light wave (how light looks like) when standing still?

That size sees everybody the same, we who are standing still and they who are moving compared to us. We can only say the observer sees other moving objects smaller in its moving direction. Only the observer sees differences. So if person A moves with almost the speed of light compared to a point of reference 1, the observer sees person A much smaller in length (here width, in moving direction) than on point of reference 1 standing still. If travelled person B (with person A) compared to person A, point of reference 2, also moves with almost the speed of light, the observer sees person B much and much smaller in length (here width, in moving direction) as person A etc. etc. Only for calculations is it important to recalculate times and distances for corrections.

E.g. if an observer standing still measures 100 km/hour for the speed of a car (observer sees car shorter because of motion effect, called length contraction), the progressing of time for the driver is different and can be calculated by the reduction factor of Lorentz (driver is not aware of this). The observer uses the reduction factor to recalculate the times (think at a GPS satellite, which is doing measurements and sent its data to us on Earth). But that reduction factor can be ignored for such a speed, this reduction factor will only be interested from e.g. 0.1 of the speed of light.

Now the question can be asked, how can you see a time dilation except in calculations ?

If somebody moves and takes a clock with him/her, we (standing still) measure with our clock a specific time t for that person between a start and endpoint. If we could look very fast, we see on the moving clock, the time going slower. The moving person sees the slower going time too, but is not aware of it.

Only the observer, the observer is the point of reference, sees the other smaller in the moving direction (here width) and a slower going time, the other is that not aware. Only the observer can compare length and times with his/her own length and times. It goes about speed differences, how greater how greater the reduction factor, observed by the observer. Suppose you have a clock, running normal for you all the time where you are on your location. But many observers with another speed see you with different speeds. Each such observer sees your length in the moving direction (here width) and time different thanks to the reduction factor.

This is also a little bit difficult point in physics. Observers see things different (think e.g. from a different angle). E.g. if you move your time is going slower compared to an observer standing still. You are not aware if your time is going slower. So nature shows a shorter length in the moving direction to the observer (here width), you are not aware that. In the next chapter you will see shortly, you will see as observer the other shorter too in the reverse moving direction and time slower going. You compare with your own as observer (point of reference). This is a real physic occasion (being shorter) but in the world seen by the observer (so a motion effect). You should probably not being shorter both, only seen by the observers separately. So observers and objects are real, but observers see objects different or can be seen different.

2.6 Symmetry and simultaneity

Now it will be really funny and probably very confusing for the starting relativist.

Relativity does also mean that both think to be standing still and the other is moving. Think to 2 persons in space, both think that the other is moving.

So everything written above is also valid for the "moving" person/object. So the "moving" person/object thinks too that the other is moving and that the progressing of time for the other is going slower. This will be called symmetry, all is symmetric for 2 persons/objecten. So in calculations times/distances must be corrected seen from both sides.

Consider if time is going slower in one direction, the same is true seen from the other direction, time is not a waterfall, in one direction faster than seen from another direction. Time can't be negative, it goes about the motion in positive meters (also motion can't be negative). So compared to each other, both are moving, both are a point of reference for the other.

For making this more easy, consider next:

p1 ---> p2,p3 --> p3

Persons 2/3 move with a constant speed V compared to person 1, so persons 2/3 undergo a time dilation. Consider person 3 again who moves with the same constant speed V compared to person 2, person 3 undergoes the same time dilation. Than you get this:

p1 ---> p2
p3 <-- p2

Now the problem for many, how can a clock from p1 running faster than a clock from p2 and at the same time a clock from p3 running slower than a clock from p2?

This is a wrong presentation. So you can say the moving direction gives the direction of time. Example: suppose the reduction factor for a specified speed is 1/10 (about 0,995 x speed of light), transmitting light (1 photon or a pulse) by p1 will be received after 200 seconds as 20 local seconds by p2 (but 1/10 slower), and afterwards light (1 photon or a pulse) transmitted by p2 will be received after 20 seconds as 2 local seconds light by p3 (again 1/10 slower, p3 leaves at moment transmitting). So in both directions the time goes slower (mechanics in a clock goes slower). You have to perceive time from 1 observer, because the concept of simultaneity is for both observers different. Suppose the clocks from p1 and p2 and p3 are synchronised at start (14:00:00) and the reduction factor 1/10. If p1 at a given moment watch its clock, p1 would consider the moment of simultaneity the moment of the calculated slower going time, so 200 seconds later is it for p1 14:03:20 and for p2 14:00:20. The other way exact the same, p2 would be consider 14:00:40 (20 local seconds later) and 14:00:21 at p3 as moments of simultaneity. You can watch both clocks only at the same moment for both when p1 and p2 and p3 meet each other again.

The time from p3 goes at most slow and p3 stays therefore something younger.

Is it not possible to see two clocks at the same moment, so I am convinced?

Yes, if you could look very fast, it would be possible, but you can’t, so we have to find another way. E.g. travelling a specified distance with a constant speed where you know the travelling time (measured with a clock standing still), and to compare the time from a moving taken clock with you (starttime set).

Are there experiments which proved a clock is running slower at a higher constant speed?

Yes, e.g. an experiment with an atom clock (precise clock) in an airplane over a great distance, the clock is running slower in that case.
And e.g. a muon (is a specific physical particle) have a fixed duration for existence. How higher the speed of the muon, how slower the disintegration, so it exists longer for an observer.

2.7 Easy / simple explanation about gravitational force (but is no force) and how a clock can be running slower

Read my own thoughts afterwards to understand description below better!

In Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity only constant speeds are handled, so constant motions. In Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity also accelerations are handled, but the basics of extra resistance is the same, only the formulas will be more complex. Also the concept gravitational force have differently seen. Above is the extra resistance equally divided in a system. Because of a heavy mass in space is that extra resistance around the mass not equal anymore and fall objects to that mass by following the path with the most less extra resistance (one speaks about curved space). So passing light around a star follows not a straight line, but follows a path in the (distorted) Higgs fields (see idea 3.0).

(27/8/15) Through the special experiment with the falling feather and bowling ball in vacuum (arrive simultaneously on the ground, so no resistance from air, just like in space), I felt the need to explain the subject gravitational force better (for others but also for myself).

Also without Einstein, so with Newton, this is already explained. The gravitational force, so with Newton a real force, for the feather is lesser than for the bowling ball because the feather weights lighter. But the acceleration is independent from the weight because for a greater weight a greater gravitational force is necessary in the Higgs fields (which are responsible for the resistance). Therefore both arrive simultaneously from the starting speed 0. If you want to accelerate something on the ground (in vacuum, so no resistance from air), so horizontally, with the same acceleration, than you have to use more force for a greater weight in the Higgs fields (f = m . a, or force = weight . acceleration), if you understand this rotate this vertically and replace that force by the gravitational force (which is greater for a greater weight). If you understand it in this way, it is ok, Einstein is just a refinement of the theory (more exactly) but give in this kind of cases the same results.

Einstein have proved with calculations in the General Theory of Relativity (the so called principle of equivalence) that the motions inside an accelerated rocket in empty space (so far from heavy masses like the Earth, Sun, Stars etc.) with a real force equally to the Newton gravitational force, have the same effects as for the motions in a gravitational field around a mass as the Earth and other objects. Also the motions paths inside he rocket are curved, so that motions follow curved paths and also passing light through the rocket (through a window) have curved by following a curved path. So this all because of the rocket’s acceleration. A falling ball and feather inside the (vacuum) rocket, follow the same path and have the same acceleration as around the Earth and fall simultaneously, all proved with calculations.
And all what is falling, does not fall because of a real force (more a pseudo force) but have to do with distorted space and time (see later my own thought). Nevertheless there is a real force necessary to accelerate something like that rocket (or to accelerate something horizontally). An accelerator meter works on force. So if something falls and there is no force working according Einstein but through distorted space and time, because of that a falling accelerator meter points to zero. But something what falls, is observed by an observer as an accelerated motion. But a falling person do experience also no force. Einstein have gotten the idea of the Theory of Relativity from a man who did fall from a roof and did tell him he felt no gravitational force.

What does this mean now?

According to Einstein is the gravitational force no real force but it seems / feels like that. Around a heavy mass as the Earth the space have curved by the so called gravitational force (felt as a gravitational force, but is no force), see this curving as a kind of safety net under the Earth in space, the effect is (for calculations etc.) if the Earth is that rocket being constantly accelerated. Therefore falls something (free fall) in a curved path to the Earth (if it only undergoes gravitational "force") in the same way as inside that rocket. On shorter distances you don’t see this curving and is it almost a straight line. Why is it going like this? Just because it is like that, the influence of a heavy mass, no further explanation (maybe in the future). On the ground you feel this gravitational force because of the floor, without floor you should undergo a free fall!

Own thoughts (totally corrected): my own thoughts are a mix from real facts and my own interpretations (maybe not totally correct but then there is a better picture to imagine, nobody knows the exact truth). If you release an object above the Earth the resistance in a direction is greater than in another direction so the object is to be going in motion (by which an object can’t be stationary), that object follows the path of the least resistance and that is the curved path to the Earth, in that curved path the resistance become lesser so the object goes to accelerate! If a clock would be attached to the object, that clock would be running slower, because the time of a faster moving clock goes always slower, but "stationary" clocks along the path go slower because of the gravitational "force" because the total resistance is greater (two resistances in another direction, therefore is the slowing up in that moving clock greater than normally, if the clock would be moving upwards would the slowing up become lesser but always above normally until the gravitational “force” wouldn’t have impact anymore) .. so through a mass like the Earth is the resistance by the Higgs fields around that mass not equally divided anymore .. because the space around that mass have/seem curved (I think only the Higgs fields are distorted) because of that and light have to travel through that space, light have curved too .. in an empty space, so far from heavy masses, is the resistance equally divided and gets an object a constant speed when releasing or is stationary without a push (unless you do this inside an accelerated rocket, than you get the same effects as around the Earth etc.) .. the gravitational force on the ground feels as a stronger force as above the Earth, but funny the resistance downwards is lesser here (but upwards greatest, compare with going upstream, a local clock runs slower on Earth and above somewhat faster, because the total build resistance since the Big Bang which determines the local time, is much greater compared with the resistance from the gravitational “force”, that time changes a little bit but not much), without floor you would fall or moving here faster .. in fact the effect in a wormhole, there is no force ..
What is the difference between the normal resistance and the resistance with gravitational "force"? Through the gravitational "force" (a distorted Higgs field) is the total resistance equal to the normal resistance plus the extra resistance through that gravitational "force". This extra resistance is greatest on the Earth, stationary clocks run above the Earth somewhat faster than on the Earth. So above the Earth goes the time somewhat faster, mostly you hear only about slower time. For normal resistance is own energy necessary from outside for motion, for a combined resistance because of the gravitational "force" (a distorted Higgs field) one get energy from the Higgs field in 1 direction (downwards) for which that resistance seems lesser (because there is no own energy necessary, but without free energy there would be more resistance), but in the other direction one need more own energy than normally (upwards). If the gravitational "force" is gone, everything is normally again (so in space, there runs a clock somewhat faster).
What is now the difference between Newton and Einstein in cases like the feather and the ball? Newton uses more force on the ball than the feather, that force is the gravitational force (which is still a real force for Newton), for a more heavy object as the ball more force have to be used in the Higgs fields (because the ball have more Higgs particles) to over win the resistance, in that way keep the feather and ball the same speed (without resistance of the air). The Higgs fields don’t know what is up or down etc., the gravitational force (Newton sees this force as a real force) comes from a heavy mass as the Earth. The energy needed by this process comes from the gravitational field, how faster the ball and the feather are moving how more kinetic energy they get weight depended. There is a constant field of resistance assumed just like in space far from big masses. For Einstein this is different. The resistance is coming lesser and lesser (in fact also more, but with free energy seems it lesser), also the energy comes from the gravitational field, it seems that objects now receive their kinetic energy from the Higgs field depended on their weight, so per Higgs particle, so keeps the speed the same for all objects (for more real resistance the weight or mass for objects is being increasing with a same factor, kinetic energy = ½ . m . v², so for more energy the speed increases)! So there is a real force necessary to over win the resistance of the Higgs fields for higher speeds like that rocket. But inside that rocket (so just as around the Earth) there originates a distorted Higgs field through which the resistance closely at the top of the rocket is greatest and after decreases more and more in a curved path because of the constant acceleration of the rocket. So if the resistance decreases, there is no force necessary and objects go to move from their selves inside that rocket or around the Earth! Of course first you have to move that objects up inside the rocket and so you have to use real force.
What is now the similarity between the Earth and the accelerating rocket in space? Through the Earth (possibly only because of the object’s size) the Higgs fields seem to be distorted around the Earth. You need a real force, equal to the gravitational force of Newton, which was a real force, to go upward. So that force belongs to that distortion of the Higgs fields. In the rocket in space far from the big masses like the Earth, you need the same force to going upward inside that rocket, because of that there are the same distorted Higgs fields related to that force!
What is in fact force? I think the needed energy from outside to change a motion in the Higgs fields. E.g. in space (far from big masses) an object keeps a constant speed unless you changes that speed with a force. Above the Earth (or other big masses) an object falls downwards because of the decreasing resistance in the Higgs fields, it seems if the object have pushed but it is no force, probably because the needed energy comes from inside the Higgs fields and not from outside!
Why run falling clocks slower? A clock is just a mechanical or digital works, fine-tuned on a standard motion, so it goes about the motions inside a clock. In the normal case without gravitational “force” a clock moves through the Higgs field and undergoes resistance at a specified speed as one whole. It costs kinetic energy to over win that resistance. That kinetic energy shall be divided over all the components in the clock mass related (weight, mass belonging to that speed of that moving clock), so also the components in motion get extra kinetic energy for that speed of the moving clock. But that components in motion had already kinetic energy for their motion, but that motion undergoes also resistance (even more), with the same kinetic energy they already had and the increase of the mass (weight) of that components in motion through the extra resistance, their speed shall be decrease. With other words the clock is going to run slower! Now explaining with gravitational “force”. The question shall be now how can a clock fall faster, so easy moving through the Higgs field, faster and faster but inside running more slower. I think there is only 1 logical answer possible. Through the distorted Higgs field around the Earth, objects in motion in 1 direction (downwards) get energy from the Higgs field self (per Higgs particle) to over win the normal resistance and the extra resistance because of the gravitational “force”, possibly more and more for which the mass of that objects increase and even their speed increase. Closer to the Earth is the gravitational “force” greater. But in the other direction is force necessary, so energy from outside to be able to move upwards. So there is only given energy in one direction (downwards). So following a path with the least resistance means here in fact, following the path where free energy is given. The rest of the explanation for the clock is the same as in the normal case, there is given energy for the mass (weight) belonging to the speed of the falling clock, but the components in motion get more resistance, so more mass and go therefore slower, they receive for their own speed no energy, there is only energy given away for an object as 1 whole.
Why follow light also a curved path because of the gravitational “force”? Materials follow a path with the least resistance in the distorted Higgs fields above the Earth etc., along that route "stationary" clocks run slower and slower. In space far from big masses like the Earth etc. undergo materials also resistance, but the Higgs fields are not distorted, how faster one will go through the fields how more force have to be used mass (weight) depended, a travelling clock runs slower and slower on that route how faster one go. If light is travelling through these Higgs fields, the resistance is everywhere equally and travels only light with the highest speed possible measured by each observer with its local clock. In the distorted Higgs fields above the Earth etc. is the resistance not equally everywhere and follow light also the path with the least resistance (obviously also a curved path). Because the speed of light is always constantly (by which these theory of the gravitational “force” originated and the distorted Higgs fields), light could travel a greater distance, a stationary clock of an observer on that path would running faster (than on Earth). So even light particles (photons) have no (rest) mass (always in motion), they follow also a path with the least resistance, their energy travel easier through the field (don’t forget that mass is a form of energy, so energy travels through the field, but materials have Higgs particles inside by which its speed have controlled and light haven’t, so have always the same speed for an observer). How do we see that curved light? Our clock on Earth goes slower than the clock from the observer along that path. So we see that light with a Doppler effect, a shorter wave length (higher frequency, I think). It can’t arrive at the same point on the same moment for both observers!
All resistances at a glance! According my own thoughts is time just a form of resistance in the Higgs fields (see this webpage). Everywhere is the Lorentz formula valid for normal resistance, if the time goes fast or slow, the same difference in speed slow down the local time with the same factor, only under influence of greater/lesser gravitational “force” that factor becomes greater/lesser! If the time goes fast in a wormhole, the resistance is lesser than normally, so that factor which slow down the local time shall be lesser too. 1) Far from big masses like the Earth in space you have Higgs fields with the same level of resistance. Depended of a push and so the quantity of kinetic energy, an object with a specified mass (weight) gets a specified constant speed (so depends of its mass and so the quantity of Higgs particles). How faster an object travels through the Higgs fields how slower goes its local time (compared when the object was “stationary” and the related local time), see the local time as a clock attached to the object. The slower going local time is only depended of the speed through the Higgs fields. Light can’t be limited in the Higgs fields but can’t go faster than the allowed maximum speed and so is the speed of light (measured with a “stationary” clock). 2) Than there can be locations in the universe e.g. wormholes for which the level of resistance is lower, with other words a local clock is running faster (I think also on the edge of our universe). With the same energy as in 1) motions can over bridge greater distances but a local "stationary" clock runs also faster. Light can also over bridge greater distances. But because a local “stationary” clock runs faster, the speed of light is the same. The local time of light itself (if a clock could be travelling with light) is 0. Also if objects in these Higgs fields would be traveling faster the local time would be slower down. 3) If an object falls because of the gravitational “force”, the object travels through a distorted Higgs fields, the resistance is decreasing and decreasing because of free energy but the real resistance is increasing (a traveling clock runs slower but a stationary clock along the route runs also somewhat slower) so with more free kinetic energy travels an object faster and faster (accelerates). Light follows also the path of the least resistance and can over bridge greater distances. 4) No resistance at all, see my thoughts about the time 0 “signal”. If one understand 1), 2) and 3), also 4) is to understand better! The time 0 in a black hole is another form of time 0, with other words there is absolutely no motion possible anymore (in exactly 1 point according Mr. Stephen Hawking)!

2.8 Gravitational waves

According Einstein changes the extra resistance around heavy masses in space, if heavy masses turns around each other, so called gravitational waves would be generated according the General Theory of Relativity. These gravitational waves cause during passing fluctuations in the extra resistance. One tries to prove this currently with detectors for laser light, laser light would be going faster/slower detected by an observer (because the extra resistance is not divided equally anymore in that case, also a clock would going faster/slower in that case). Personal thought: the extra resistance around the Earth is lesser because the Earth rotates through the Higgs fields (fields are being transformed), therefore gravitational waves are kept off, they would be measured earlier outside our Earth (but maybe not). If time goes slower or faster in a location, light travels a shorter or longer path, the speed of light is always equally (so this have nothing to do with the Doppler Effect, that is observed when an observer in a different time light from another time observed). There are now a few possibilities: - light would follow a curved path (is detectable) – if the time goes slower, the path of light is shorter (would be detectable with laser pulses, so not 1 full beam of laser light) – if the time goes faster, the path of light is longer (would be detectable with laser pulses, so not 1 full beam of laser light). But the measuring equipment must work in our time, so far from that location where the gravitational waves pass, otherwise you measure no effect (I think, the measuring equipment is the observer). But because the pipes with laser light are positioned perpendicular on each other, one is prepared for many possibilities.

3.0 My own thoughts about our universe (why the speed of light is always constant, follow a curved path because of the gravitational "force" or the Higgs fields, why particles can be on 2 places at the same time, possibly direct communication with everyone and anything in our universe etc., the existance of an invisible universe with time 0 near the visible universe but Einstein is still valid, photons which pass the time 0 + summarized in an overall picture)

Generally: the Lorentz formula says only and nothing more that the local time is going slower when you leave a position with a local time with a constant speed, it says nothing about how that local time on that position have been originated!

Generally: it is not necessary to understand everything to the details with this kind of subjects, globally is good enough until someone ever makes it clear for 100% (but Einstein is not alive anymore) but that is a matter of time! If you as scientist e.g. believe in nothing but only that nature have decided by itself to create everything (like nature is an independent entity), I can’t understand that these kind of subjects could be satisfying, for me personally they would be ice cold!

Read 2.7 Easy / simple explanation about gravitational force (but is no force), for the curved path of light!

I have started this subject ever for myself from point of interest to know what is time and if there is something mysterious with time, probably because of the many science fictions. Of course is everything a mystery, but time is seen by myself nothing special and good to understand. I understand Relativity also, but I see this more from the beginning point where our universe have originated and so good to understand too. I continue further with reading about parallel worlds and I am curious if I see something special for myself or if this is nothing more than science fiction because one cannot interpret the results from specified formulas very well until now (it is still exciting).

I want this subject concerning time to finish for myself just because you have to wait if physicists, they spent their live time about these subjects, ever come with some new information, personally it may not become an obsession otherwise you should first start a study about Physics and that is personally something to much, I don't need it to know everything and besides cost too much time. Besides personally seen it goes too much about technics and science in our current world, if these are the only goals in our short lives (I found it more important to live in a nice world with less self-interest, I wished that we were also fanatically in that)!

Yet I have with my own fantasy an image of everything, but it is a fantasy because I have read too little about all these subjects, but it can give ideas. But I find this fantasy not that creasy. I see it as follows.

I see happening the Bing Bang in a point of the fourth dimensional space. This have given a force for which our space have originated, and this space stretch out itself with a constant speed. Possibly Higgs fields are continuously originated at the edge or Higgs fields are available in the fourth dimension and fill this space. Through diverse physics processes originate on locations in this space transformations of these Higgs fields (which give more or less resistance). On the moment that this space starts stretching out itself with a constant speed, light travels with speed c if we should measure this with our clock from Earth. On Earth we have introduced once this unit of time and according this unit is the speed of light c, if we had chosen another unit this could be 2c or even 10c. But the Theory of Relativity learns us that with the chosen unit, the ratio “travelled path of light” divided by the “(slower/faster) time” always constant is, so for us c. Everything what is in motion stretch the space from the starting location and the maximum stretching of this space is always the ratio “travelled path of light” divided by the “(slower/faster) time”, so in our case 300.000km/second. This stretching is again determined in the fourth dimension, so outside our universe. At the edge of our universe that ratio is again c, the clock can run eventually fast in that location. All these stretching’s intersect with each other. From the fourth dimension even extra space can come in (a mini Big Bang etc.). There is a limitation, space can only stretch there where are Higgs fields (with different densities eventually). So as well materials as light follow always these Higgs fields. Materials undergo resistance from the Higgs fields through the Higgs parts, light undergo no resistance but cannot go faster than the local maximum stretching of space and is always c. Materials follow the path of the most least resistance in the Higgs fields, light also, see 2.7 (light is being curved, in curved space time). Materials undergo as 1 unity resistance of the Higgs fields for which this on molecular level need not to be exactly the same, so there can be differences with the Quantum Mechanics. With the stretching of space for all what is in motion, you can explain the speed of light, it can be something else of course what looks like. Finally you come always at the point, how can this be .. and being always our limit ..

But maybe exists a fourth dimension only in our fantasy, and only possible in Mathematics. Maybe there is only one space, and is a new Big Bang prepared in a black hole after a very long time (and not all equally forcefully), suppose that suddenly its field is eliminated by something (maybe when our Earth is considered as a failed project ?) .. and the clock in a black hole points probably again to the time 0, nothing is in motion anymore .. so again a special case, outside the black hole (seen as 1 unity) the clock runs, inside the clock does not run .. I can imagine that for myself, a black hole is also in motion and you measure that with a clock, but inside are the Higgs fields in that way spread out that from all sides no motion is possible anymore, so the clock does not run anymore but the black hole as 1 unity is in motion, so unless the available kinetic energy from the unity as 1 (black hole) inside the time is 0 again, just now as everything is exploding (relativity starts again) all parts get pro ratio that kinetic energy with it .. so a not running clock (time 0) says nothing about the available (kinetic) energy, so just as for light .. the world seen from light (is the observer) is empty and time is always 0 .. absolutely nothing specially .. the sequence of events is not important anymore when time is 0 because there are no events anymore, nothing is in motion, a clock is no clock anymore .. time is just what an ordinary clock made by ourselves points to because of the Higgs fields .. why physicists for this and other subjects always involve other invisible never to prove worlds, is for me a great mystery (how should Einstein thought about this)? .. to my modest opinion I think that many (or just a few) physicists seeing time as something magically .. for me is time just as a thermometer .. the absolute point zero is to compare with the time 0 in a black hole (or just in 1 point according Mr. Stephen Hawking) while further on the time is above 0 .. absolutely nothing magically (there exist no universal time, but everywhere is “time” passing, slow or quick, nevertheless not to measure in a point with time 0) .. is the outcome from a formula a magical time than that formula is just wrong (I think) ..

But to describe the macro world as Einstein have done, looks to me more simple than to describe the micro world of particles (Quantum Mechanics) with all its formulas. There is still no link between this 2 worlds in formulas. Possibly is there only a link for specified properties?

In Quantum Mechanics one discovered that particles sometimes can be on more places at the same time. Also one discovered that particles can be entangled. I don’t explain now how particles can be entangled (in fact in a simple way but must first be close to each other, or discovery in NL via light connected with each other on greater distances, see here an excellent animation, copy link : "http://www.nu.nl/wetenschap/3405546/teleportatie-van-elektronen-stap-dichterbij.html", or this copy link : "http://media.zie.nl/e/?v=m1nzdrgfg36u&sanoma_poster_url=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.zie.nl%2Fm%2Fm1nzdrgfg36u_m.jpg", for particles of light itself, photons, is the local time in fact already 0, so it seems that the photons both particles entangled via the invisible space, see later, maybe is 1 photon already enough between 2 particles) but the result is that both particles can communicate with each other distance independent. Changes at one of the both particles are being communicated immediately (time 0) to the other and taken over (e.g. 1 particle on Earth and the other on Mars). In 6.0 I try to give / collect more information about the experiment related to this animation with some own thoughts, the animation need not to present the experiment truthfully (in fact there need to be only 1 reflecting light wave, but you may not know from which electron, that are the laws of Quantum Mechanics, if you could follow it really with your eyes, the entanglement would fail)!

Suppose that a signal exist which without resistance can communicate (so immediately with time 0) with that particles. A speed can be still limited to the speed of light, but possibly an unlimited great speed exists what in fact not may be called speed anymore (another definition) .. imaginable I find .. a communication possibility to other Earth's if one know to use this signal (one must be at least civilized at the same level, if one can communicate)?

Now a particle have the particle properties as soon as one do something with it like measuring etc. But besides that a particle is also presenting itself as a wave. Both have a resistance as described in this article. But it could be possible also that in circumstances a particle presents itself as a second wave without resistance (the signal itself as mentioned above). Because of that a particle can be seen at more places at the same time. Possibly are two entangled particles the same particle seen on 2 places at the same time. If it would be 2 particles, the particles are maybe during the entanglement via the second wave (without resistance) connected with each other in 2 directions. I can't describe this precisely of course, but it can give ideas, this could be the missing link (possibly is already more thought about that).

Now a living creature is unique to identify with the aid of DNA. Because of the entangled particles one would think that even each particle is unique to identify, but that is not a must possibly. In fact is it already very admirable what science have discovered so far!

The Higgs particle is called "the God's particle", if this immediate communication would be possible, you could call this jusitified "the God's channel of communication"!

Some (or many?) of us believe that our consciousness are being outside our brains, with the existence of such signals eventually, our consciousness can be millions of light-years away ..

I have no religious background, I am a humanist, but .. with a physically knowledge of the real truth (which I don't know) you could explain every miracle, something is a miracle when you don’t understand which Physics is hiding behind. I don’t know if there have been real miracles, but it could be possible. This is just also logically thinking with somewhat phantasy. Everything in nature is a manipulation of particles! A particle have the secret of live!


Example explained:

1) signal: a normal sinus wave with resistance
2) "the signal" without resistance (time 0 sec. or (see later) .0000 .. a couple of x billion zeroes ..001)
3) arrival signal with resistance
At 2 and 3 are converters used of course!

These are all just thoughts .. such signal will be difficult to detect but finally to catch experimentally and how to deal with it .. the entanglement of particles is a start ..

I think there exist a visible universe in which everything undergo resistance and all known physical laws are valid, and an invisible one (mixed with the visible universe) in which no resistance exist (and only used on particles level) .. In the invisible universe you find “the signals”, particles are only visible in the visible universe. Einstein's Theory of Relativity is completely based on the formula of our Lorentz (NL) which is based again on the speed of light as maximum speed possible. These speed of light is visible in the visible universe and is limited through its structure (currently still unknown). With “the signals” in the invisible universe not one physical law is violated in the visible universe. These “signals” go across the visible universe. This invisible universe with time 0 can't exist on its own, only interwoven with the visible universe. So particles use not always the invisible space as being that “signal”, e.g. in CERN let one rotate particles in the visible space, if one do something specific with particles they stay in the visible space. This behavior (doing something specific) is known in Quantum Mechanics. You can’t use distances and times in the visible space in formulas if particles have used the invisible space (partly), that gives inaccuracy.

In which situations is the time 0 possible (own opinion)? In the visible universe we approach almost the time 0 for materials under high speeds (but always just under the speed of light), a clock goes very slowing because of resistance. A photon (particle) in a light wave with the speed of light experiences the time 0 (there can no clock exist), all photons in a light wave be stationary relative to each other, materials are probably not visible anymore, light is probably used through materials. Possibly are all photons in a light wave already more or less entangled. In the invisible universe are no distances (if the time is exact 0, but see later too), there is nothing to bridge, because no resistance exist (there can no clock exist) the time is 0. In the visible universe is the time 0 in a black hole or exactly in 1 point (Mr. Stephen Hawking) through resistance from all sides (also there can no clock exist). So all situations with time 0 are not exactly the same. But I think that all locations with time 0 are reachable via the invisible space, so it seems that a black hole is influenceable.

So it seems that photons which have a local time of 0 it selves, that time 0 can pass as a connection with time 0 during a collision and can entangle 2 particles in this way in the visible space (on the point of the collision the local time does not change in the visible universe, that can only be 0 for a photon in the invisible universe, afterwards creates the photon a track of time 0 from that point, when both tracks of both particles are being connected, the particles are entangled). Both particles just as the photons still move in the visible space but have contact with each other via the invisible space via the “signals”. Besides particles can relocate via the invisible space via the “signals” and can be visible on more locations at the same time in the visible space. But it could be possible that particles first must have a connection with the invisible space and only then can relocate via the invisible space through the “signals”, that is not exactly to describe yet of course. Possibly a particle can always relocate via the invisible space, but having contact via the invisible space via entanglement while it is in the visible space. Possibly this contact can be broken when a particle relocates via the invisible space. A photon have the local time 0, but that does not mean the photon always relocates through the invisible space (there is the speed of light unlimited or 0), maybe never but other particles use the invisible space in situations (that is all research). Possibly can be many particles be entangled at the same time.

And possibly are particles entangled, until through a disturbance of light the connection have broken again. Possibly are there many and many particles entangled in nature at times.

New thought: possibly are light particles, called photons, because of their local time 0, always as “signal” present in the invisible universe (see B) and at the same time visible in the visible universe (see A), both are always entangled. This “signal” in the invisible universe (uncoupled) entangle two other kind of particles (connection faster than light or immediately). But see also 5.0, other kind of particles have possibly also this possibility, maybe it goes easier with light because of its local time 0! But because I don’t know much about the Quantum Mechanics (but I go to read that), I could imagine that only the spin of particles have been entangled. Maybe it is going as next: during the entanglement the “signal” of light have been replaced by the entangled “signals” from both particles in the invisible space, possibly the entangled "signals" are activated after the time 0 connection have been completed, that the spin of both particles is opposite is also logically, the motions are transmitted mirrored, possibly how more light is used for the entanglement how stronger the connection. Scientists give not all the details away for our tax money (but they had not my idea I think), it must first be sure if oneselves can not develop a new superweapon, possibly is the invisible time 0 connection (see animation) completed yet after the visible light have been extinguished (two waves have eliminated each other). I have also to think continually about the fact, is such time 0 “signal” a kind of signal or a kind of wormhole from science fictions going through the visible universe. I think if you place a particle (not a photon) in a kind of wormhole without resistance, nothing happens. If there exists no resistance, a particle can be in any place in such wormhole in the visible universe. There must be a destination if a particle relocates in the visible universe through such a wormhole. Therefore I am almost convinced that such “signal” a kind of signal is without resistance and with a destination, with other words a wormhole without resistance does not exist. A wormhole with a little resitance can exist, that is just Physics of the visible universe. Unfortunately all our instruments work in the visible universe, but you can see what happens and explaining how I see it but for the time being no more, so for the time being still space enough for the negative/arrogant people and the weapons industries. It stays a matter of believing or not believing, I hope that someday our intellect will triumph and the next Big Bang stays away! The nature have been designed with a high intellect, it is just waiting on the next Einstein who will understand the "signal". I think myself the Big Bang have been originated in a black hole, possibly circulates live in this way e.g. when our sun have been finished, but with these “signals” a Big Bang could just be originated too in 1 point controlled from the invisible universe!

But you can see the invisible universe also as an universe where a very very little resistance exist and such “signal” travels with an unbelievable high speed compared with the visible universe (time .0000 .. couple of x billion zeroes ..001 sec.). Einstein's Theory of Relativity / Lorentz is still valid for the visible universe! The separation between the two universes is just depended of 1 “signal” which we don’t know and (almost) don’t suffer from resistance! Our kind of clocks do not work in the invisible universe, our clocks work only in the visible universe.

Nevertheless if you give that “signal” an unlimited high speed, so not exactly 0, possibly the property is not valid anymore that particles can be on more places at the same time. This is I think only possible because the travelling time is 0 sec., unless this is an illusion and through the unlimited speed of that “signal” still possible. Einstein is still not in danger! Also travelling back from the future is still not possible, it is also the question if the human body should be able to cope with that differences in time. If I was God, I used that “signal” to control the whole universe.

I know that this idea of this “signal” can be seen as nonsense, but against every other kind of thinking as the usual one, also “resistance” exist, it just needs its time .. I hope that the right qualified person reads this idea and works it out ..

If such “signal” would be possible, than there are many possibilities more how our live on Earth have started. In me the next phantasy came up although it doesn’t go about the absolute beginning of everything, just an fiction in my brains. Suppose their exist a civilization very far from here and not to discover by us in the visible universe with much more knowledge than we have. The Big Bang have started in a natural way in a black hole or they have generated the Big Bang in a black hole. After they have bring live to Earth. They have done this all by an experiment. Compared with the beginning point with time zero of the Big Bang, their “Earth” have a speed through space just below the speed of light (but followed a different path of motions). So their time go terrible slower than our time as I think (see descriptions in this article). They see our development of millions of years via that “signals” in 1 life but played off in slow motion.

This last phantasy example shows already a problem. If the differences in time (resistance) are big, the communication via the “signal” is immediately in 1 direction possible but the answer can arrive years later, in each case one must respond quickly. So immediate communication between 2 worlds is practically possible if the time differences (resistance) are not big in the visible universe.

The idea for the entanglement of particles came as a comic paradox from Einstein himself who had not much with the Quantum Mechanics (so Einstein was human and had as everybody also his limitations). Nevertheless later it was proved in reality. So that means the thoughts in the Quantum Mechanics are reasonable good. So there must be somewhere a part in this theory in which the possibility of “totally no resistance” have sneaked into.

Just to be sure I want to emphasize I have no religious background, but I find it logical that something not can exist for ever without a reason, otherwise would nothing be more logical! Suppose there exist a God, possibly have God the same questions as us, but God knows undoubtedly already more answers! You can believe in something qua logic, but it is not necessary to pray to something.

In fact I had also the idea in the past that such “signal” could not be possible, currently I have lesser doubts about that looking to the strangeness’s in the Quantum Mechanics, because in fact we know not much about the whole concept, so everything is possible. Is it pleasant to know everything? Strange but truth, for me personally is it not necessary, I find it more important to make something pleasant from our Earth for humans and animals (e.g. not throwing living lobsters in boiling oil in the year 2015, did you know Einstein was a vegetarian), but too little attention is given to that through self-interest and wanting to rule over others with own ideas, very strong qualities inside humans from nature.

From the news: There is even a possibility in the close future to convert light to materials ..

Summarized in an overall picture (as I see it, true or not true):

Explanation (read for complete understanding first all in 3.0):

This all is based of course on facts from Physics which have to be true. The first layer from the universe exists out of the invisible universe in which no resistance exist (time 0). The second layer from the universe exists out of the visible universe in which resistance exists. The second layer is over the first layer integrated, the first layer can only exist on its own thanks to the second layer which fills the universe. In the second layer are the Higgs fields through which all materials undergo resistance as well as the time (is a by ourselves chosen standard motion). Particles of light, called photons (see C), have in the first (as “signal”) as well as in the second layer no resistance (local time 0), but have in the second layer resistance from the structure of the universe, possibly a second function of the Higgs fields. Because of this resistance can light never faster than the well-known speed of light c (this is encapsulated in the visible universe, so the second layer). In the first layer there are the “signals” with time 0 which can reach all locations in the second layer (possibly with a connection to time 0 e.g. a black hole). The separation between these two layers is just depended of 1 “signal” which we don’t know and don’t suffer from resistance! Entangled particles (see A) in the second layer have got a connection with time 0 via collided photons causing a track of time 0. Read above in 3.0 what is happening possibly. Particles can relocate as “signal” with time 0 through the first layer and because of that be visible at the same time on more places in the second layer (see B). In fact keeps a particle the secret of live, possibly is this secret never given by nature to the living people! “It is all a coincidence after coincidence just started from nothing” is the most simple thought ever produced by humans and based on absolutely nothing. Also the evolution have nothing to do with it! The tunnel which we possibly all see if we die, can possibly be activated in our bodies during live, logically because all is a physically function in nature, but why is this function there, you can say all is a coincidence but it is a very simple thought and in fact also very negative! It is just as with prosperity which we have had for the first time in history since the last 50 years, it would be give more happiness and satisfaction, but unfortunately the powerful people in this world have been more greedy because of this, by which that happiness again for many people have killed in the bud, what is wrong with mankind in this world?
4.0 Parallel worlds and own opinion

This is all so theoretically that I don’t want to read it in fairness. Let us first to work out hard facts than al that speculations etc.

With this kind of subjects it looks that physicists it often go to search more complicated as it is in reality. Until now everything what is discovered by scientists is logically explainable and so it will be with further discoveries (meanwhile our brains become more developed). Also the Lorentz formula shows that the by us self introduced definition of time, goes slower when motions go slower within a system (with a higher speed), unless one can restrain oneself to give no magical explanation to that. Also I find my own idea logically, the “nature / God / manager / it is all a coincidence after coincidence just started from nothing (the most simple thought ever produced by humans and based on absolutely nothing)” do not need billions of light years to manage something from both sides in the universe.

Personally I think, that with thinking in more dimensions (> 3) solutions for problems are postponed because that is never to check, I think all solutions are just found in our universe, but both possibilities are “strange” of course, but you have to accept something as long as our brains can’t understand it all ..

But if you believe in parallel worlds you believe in fact in nothing anymore, because the concept of that worlds is absolutely purposeless (would be a random concept of the independant entity nature, or you believe we are an experiment from others)!

5.0 Quantum Mechanics and own opinion

Ever I learned in a study how a transistor current have been argued with the aid of the Quantum Mechanics, also semi-conductors were described. But this was especially argued with the theory of probability, so I found this not special enough to think, this was not been possible without the Quantum Mechanics.

But other characteristics like entangled particles and non-locality argued in the Quantum Mechanics are special and somewhere I have the strong feeling that this all can be explained with my idea (what others can have too already) from an mixed universe without resistance, so in which there is no time. This I go to read and is excited if I can find back my own thoughts in this theory, so that these oddities in each case for myself are not so strange anymore (of course accepting “totally no resistance” and its effects). But ok this again will take a while.

I bought the expensive book “Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by Griffiths, David J.” because of good references, but this book looks a reference book for formulas near a study, there is almost no explanation given, so this is not to read, it starts right of the moment with a formula without any introduction about the principles of the Quantum Mechanics. So I have first to start with another readable book, I go first to read "The Fabric of the Cosmos" from Brian Green, no formulas, just words, exactly what I looking for (too much details are not important for me, that is for real physicists)! But meanwhile I have bought more books (see 7.0).

It is all yet much theory in Physics about these kind of subjects, and there are new theories by which physicists can switch fast with other words indeed theories with much impressive mathematics, but when you are wrong it is not more than that. You turn a wrong track, and finally the theory ends on a dead track. So possibilities enough for other ideas.

New thought: Nothing read yet about the Quantum Mechanics but the brains work typically. You are busy with other things and meanwhile the brains are still thinking about something else and suddenly an idea arises. To think in quanta (the most little units in nature) is in fact the same as thinking in a visible and invisible universe, so a coincidence. A particle moves in the visible universe not as a flowing movement in the Quantum Mechanics, but goes from position to position i.e. it is located in a position and the next moment (how long that takes depends from the resistance, so it’s speed) it is suddenly located in the next position with other words it was invisible for some time (time 0). So generally you can say each particle in motion is entangled with it’s invisible “signal” in the invisible universe (time 0). You don't have quanta in the invisible universe. So I can understand the theory finally comes with entangled particles and non-locality. Because when the invisible “signal” have been uncoupled you get a 0 connection as between e.g. two entangled particles. This “signal” does not need to get by light only (maybe it goes easier with light because of its local time 0), so an entanglement is maybe also possible in other ways (but I don’t know them because all that information is difficult to find from our tax money, so we work all on its own, Physics is owned by physicists as oil from nature is owned by oil kings, we consumers are only important when inventions must be bought to very enrich a little group of people from our tax money). I have now also a vague feeling about why one believe in parallel worlds, but personally I don’t absolutely believe that (it seems to me a wrong track). But ok I have to read this all (see 6.0) but have already the feeling to be ok in my thoughts! And if not, than it is just wrong! Today 30/4/15, I found this document "What quantum mechanics describes is discontinuous motion of particles", copy link : "http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/447/1/qm.PDF".

6.0 Conclusion: My own hypotheses

Hypothese 1

The postulate of Einstein which says the speed of light is always constant in space (principle for Lorentz) would be changed already (this is true but have not be the principle for the Theory of Relativity I think). I think the speed of light have to be replaced by the encapsulated ration max. distance / time c in the Higgs fields (and principle for Lorentz). Because of this ration the speed of light is c in space but not everywhere on Earth or through some materials. See 3.0 for a more detailed explanation or Time dilation, length contraction and Higgs (an idea, for explaining time dilation).

This can be proven maybe far in the future with research in space (dark materials etc.).

Hypothese 2

There exist a visible universe in which Einstein is valid and there exist a mixed invisible universe without time (time 0). There exist “signals” with time 0 in the invisible universe which can reach every location in the visible universe. These “signals” can be elementary particles which relocate but only be visible in the visible universe. Each visible elementary particle is entangled with a “signal” in the invisible universe, when this “signal” can be uncoupled this can be used for the entanglement of particles. This uncoupling go for light particles (photons) easiest because the local time of light is already 0 (time 0). The speed of light is limited in the visible universe through the structure of the visible universe. The Big Bang could be originated among other things in a point in the visible universe via these “signals” (elementary particles) send from the invisible universe. These “signals” arrive possibly from somewhere where also time exist, but we have of course totally no idea what there exist outside our sight!

These “signals” with time 0 can't to be measured by us, because our measuring instruments work only in the visible universe!

What do these “signals” contain? The most probably info about the "shape" and properties from elementary particles (but I think that only more greater structures have a shape and reflected light give them an image; see link at the top of this webpage, experiment in 1998 from our Dutch physicist Dirk Bouwmeester, he and 50 others in the world are currently busy if some theory of the Quantum Mechanics is also appropriate to big objects, I am happy that he is busy with such experiments to shut out possibilities, when parallel worlds would exist than we are as I think an experiment from others, we like it also to copy everything and give us the feeling to be smart as nature itself, and prove why we stay so primitive, so I don’t hope intensely mister Dirk Bouwmeester!, but happily it does not need to be explained as parallel worlds, a bigger object can maybe be brought in a superposition (waiting on results experiment, explanation superposition see below), but don’t need that to be always, possibly only during an experiment by humans and not by nature!).

I am going to read books about the Quantum Mechanics (slowly when I have time, a big problem unfortunately, started from 8/6/15) to explore this by myself, and shall list points below (with "-") how the Quantum Mechanics is build up and points (with "*") which support my thoughts (if my thoughts are right of course):

-there is developed a special kind of Mathematics for the Quantum Mechanics comparable with vectors (direction, length, angles etc. as we know them from our basic Mathematics as arrows for e.g. forces) but for which that vectors are a subset from the whole, for which that vectors are called kets and bras (Dirac notation), except for that subset of vectors, defined concepts as e.g. length etc. for kets and bras need not to be imaginable anymore with e.g. pictures. Do you want to follow this all you have also to pick up your knowledge about matrices, determinants and complex numbers. The results of differentiations and integrations can you just accept as knowledge (these are all right of course).
-the Quantum Mechanics bundles all oddness’s in formulas, but they are not linked with explanations, so space enough for own explanations. Nobody understands the Quantum Mechanics but it are facts. It is a design which we don’t understand anymore, and some (many?) call it therefore again prematurely a coincidence (?). Personally I am only interested in the time 0 “signals” (for an eventually UN project, suppose their exist a God and shows up in Rome between the people and on tv, very likely is this already forgotten after one week and concluded as nonsense, very difficult to change something in the world with the qualities people have), currently is one very busy with the usage of these facts for a.o. supercomputers, cryptology (more behind one's back) etc., I am not so sure anymore if this all is progress together with the robot technology, only considering the last 15 years .. there are simply groups of people in all parts of the world who find that the world belongs to them only, they are powerfully and misuse everybody and all around them as long they need them .. and this all is just a start ..
-in the String Theory (is no Quantum Mechanics) would matters from the Quantum Mechanics being better explainable (but the String Theory is more developed just for better explaining matters and have lesser science ground, but it is a method)
-Einstein have confirmed the theory that light exists out of particles (photons) which have all a specified energy frequency depended but not depended on the intensity (than more/lesser photons)
-by very reducing the intensity of light photons arrive at a detector with an interval of e.g. 1 millisecond, so a photon can be isolated in this way
-light can be seen as a wave, but also as particles after each other, it depends on the kind of experiment what is applicable
-many research have be done by physicists in the past, but Einstein’s talent was making conclusions, with the Quantum Mechanics he had more trouble in understanding (but in his time the entanglement was not proved experimentally, but it was his idea)
-through measurements one can define that something is big (e.g. a flying plane) or that something is small (e.g. an electron), if a measurement have done to something small its equilibrium have disturbed
-each elementary particle (so not just a photon) can present itself generally as a particle but also as a wave
-so each elementary particle (also a photon, so light) is a mix from a wave in a field (a wave is always a disturbance in a field, you have e.g. magnetic, electric, electromagnetic, Higgs, Kwantum Fields etc.) and a particle (a little heap of energy). For a photon is that field an electromagnetic field, for a specific kind of particles an unknown Quantum Field etc. All the waves from photons combined give waves of light. As if the energy below the maximum and minimum from the wave in the field have used for the particle, as if particle and wave are one entity!
-generally independant elementary particles (not yet participating in a structure) have many properties at the same time (wave, particle, spin etc.), it is in a superposition, but a property will be visible only, forced, when a measurement have done (otherwise it is nor a particle, nor a wave, nor the exact location is known etc.)
-there are situations for which one can force a property immediately, but generally have all that properties a chance to present themselves, so if one want to force a specific property one have to repeat an experiment many times
-also nature don’t allow in specific situations with the aid of detection sources to detect when a property presents it selves, this can be just to look to it (this seems to torpedo the natural chances), than it fails to force such property (these are just laws in the Quantum Mechanics)
*the entanglement of properties between particles have indeed no time element (see link in the beginning of this webpage)
*looking to an experiment with particles can give another result (see link in the beginning of this webpage), this have of course to do with light (own thought) which cause disturbances
*an explanation is given by some physicists for the entanglement of photons by using their local times of 0 (see link in the beginning of this webpage)
*the time outside our universe must be 0 (see link in the beginning of this webpage), according an experiment in 2013, the time 0 “signals” are coming closer!
*Chinese scientists (see link in the beginning of this webpage) have already in 2013 measured the time of info over an entangled connection, and say indeed it can be instantaneous (immediately), so time 0, nice to see your own thoughts confirmed! How to measure, just compare it with light, which of both arrive first!
-you would think there exist so called Quantum Fields for which so called field lines (compare with lines of flux in magnetic fields) carry for the entanglement of properties between particles (and a so called field line can't exists on its own, e.g. for magnetism there must be always a north and south pole), but still you don’t have an answer how the Big Bang started, that must have been started with information from outside, so time 0 “signals” delivering info about the visible part and properties of elementary particles (building blocks of materials and life), besides so called field lines are time 0 “signals” too. But it can take over more than centuries before one understand something about these "signals" and can use them e.g. for contacts with other worlds (the only way possible I think)!
-photons (so particles of light) have a versatile function in nature, they can e.g. in a direction transmit properties of a particle (don’t to be elementary, particles don't need to be entangled) to another particle far away, e.g. transmitting the spin between atoms from one atom to another (via emitting and absorbing a photon, this seems to be possible unconditionally, so chance independent, important for supercomputers, see "Dutch Magazine for Physics" August 2015), or e.g. transmit energy to electrons for which the photons are absorbed or originated when electrons emit energy, or e.g. cause an entanglement between particles (don’t to be elementary) after which the particles have opposite properties e.g. one particle have a spin up while the other particle have a spin down etc., I am not religious but you would sooner call a photon the “God’s particle” than the particle from Higgs (God created light on the first day, the importance of that is clear now)
-the entanglement of 2 photons (particles of light) goes very simple: send a laser with 1 photon through a Beta Barium Borate crystal, than there is a chance (so to have repeat often) the photon will split and 2 entangled photons will leave the crystal with a lower energy (total energy have to be the same), so the properties of the photons will be opposite, e.g. if 1 photon goes through a dichroic mirror (depends on a chance) the other photon don’t (will be mirrored), also one can transmit the properties from a third photon (not entangled) via the entangled connection to the entangled photon, the third photon disappears and the properties of the entangled photon are identic to the third photon (so teleported), *the time 0 “signals” are still correct, through the entanglement both entangled time 0 “signals” from the independent photons are connected with each other, the third photon have moved through a time 0 “signal” and is visible again
-meanwhile I have found an article which the experiment from entanglement between 2 electrons on a distance (see animation in 3.0) describes better (amazing), but not 100% unfortunately, so I have to search further, without all exact details you can say/think nothing meaningfully about it, it is an article "Door meten tot quantumverstrengeling (Dutch)" from a.o. the Dutch physicist Ronald Hanson from the "Dutch Magazine for Physics", November 2013 and in Dutch only (nowhere to find on the internet unfortunately, only not clickable links to it, so I may not publish the pdf too, so go to the library or take a subscription on the magazine so you may look in the archive), but I may to explain it now. Also is described how 2 atom kernels (finally another way) on short distance are being entangled without light, I come back on it later. How more often you read it, how more you go to understand the laws of the Quantum Mechanics. So one is unbelievable far advanced (the reason one don't dump the info everywhere, as usual there are big issues in the game, just for a small group than), but you can't do this in your kitchen! Now (later) 1 article (“Demonstration of entanglement-by-measurement of solid-state qubits”) about the entanglement between atom kernels is free to see, copy link "http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v9/n1/full/nphys2444.html" while the other article (“Heralded entanglement between solid-state qubits separated by three metres”) about the entanglement of 2 electrons can be bought, copy link "http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v497/n7447/full/nature12016.html" (under conditions I think because of publications). In May 2014 it was already successfully to transfer specific spin positions (100%, so not chance dependent) from one electron to the other electron in the entangled connection.
-the explanation (1) about electrons with light as mediator: both electrons will be set first in superposition only for their spin, that means they have all spin properties at once (so no spin property is specifically applied, 0 or 1), a laser with photons have fired on both electrons, in contact with the photons the electron have forced to apply a spin property, if the spin from an electron would be position 1 no photon would be reflected, if the spin from an electron would be position 0 some photons would be reflected (in fact I mean with this own word a new photon have generated by the electron : by emission, both situations are earlier investigated with electrons for which that spin position was known), in the Quantum Mechanics everything depends on chances, for many repetitions a situation occurs, the reflected photons go through a dichroic mirror for which there is a chance a photon goes through or is being mirrored, with detectors is tested after the mirror if photons are reflected (through or mirrored), now it turns out that both electrons are entangled when exactly 1 photon have detected because that means the spins are opposite (opposite properties), now the question can arise why that mirror, because the nature don’t allow that one knows from which electron a photon reflected, it is after all an entanglement for which the properties must be opposite 0 and 1 or 1 and 0, which position is not important, if one knows that position than it is forced and no entanglement (just a 0 1 or 1 0 situation), the nature don’t know if one knows but don’t allow disturbances for which the chances are not naturally anymore (own thought), if one wants to know one uses detection sources for which light have used (e.g. by looking) or other disturbing signals, the chance the entanglement succeeds is 1 on 10 million and should be tested, but because not all details are 100% known to me I am not able to form conclusions for myself, therefore I try first to find answers on the next questions (but the chance to find / to get I estimate low, I am also an object in the Quantum Mechanics): 1) are the lasers fired from the same source? (if yes, 2 photons could be already entangled OR so there is a track of time 0 between the electrons via light) 2) succeeds the entanglement only for 1 photon or also when more photons are reflected from the same electron? (than the entanglement would be tested each time when more than 0 photons are reflected) 3) would the entanglement being a fact just after the mirror OR if one detects a photon? (because possibly absorbed) 4) Why are the chances so low? I have bought the experiment’s paper on internet and after reading much as an amateur collected the answers by myself. 1) yes 2) unknown, possibly there is always 1 photon generated at emission (no knowledge of that) 3) unknown, but the photon have absorbed after measuring because a photo diode have used 4) there are many factors e.g. only 3% of the generated photons at emission can be used etc. etc.
-own thoughts (2) about electrons with light as mediator: the researchers claim in the article because there is only 1 reflected photon, so only from 1 electron a photon is reflected, there haven’t been a contact between both electrons and still there is an entanglement, so Magic. Question 1 shall be answered with yes I think, because the photons may not have any distinction from which electron reflected, with 2 different lasers this would be impossible, only with 1 laser one can (and also not always I think, therefore the low chance possibly) generate photons which have exactly the same properties as frequency and polarization (that is the form of the kind of electromagnetic waves in which the photons travel). So via the laser there exist already a track of time 0 via light between the electrons. In one of the other way the entangled time 0 “signal” have being uncoupled from the light. Also when there would originate 2 entangled photons sometimes at the laser, than you would’t know either from which electron a photon would be reflected. If the photon possibly have absorbed during the measurement is that possibly the moment from uncoupling (therefore 1 photon, with 1 photon the light on the time 0 track have extinguished in one time, that would not be possible with more photons in one time, just thoughts). Meanwhile is also known that photons can pass properties to other particles, in that way is it possible maybe that photons can pass the Quantum Mechanics property for the connection to time 0 to both electrons and is activated on a specific moment. The moment of the entanglement. There exist shortly detectors which can detect / count photons but not absorb them, the photons still exist. Would the entanglement also a fact if a photon would be detected but not absorbed. You know it when you measure, without a dichroic mirror the nature give no entanglement (otherwise you know from which electron the photon came from). So just after the mirror the entanglement could be a fact. If detection is enough (absorbed or not absorbed), you would think the photon must first be subjected to another chance, so the mirror, after a non-natural activity as measuring and the process have finished. So this is also a mystery from nature!
-the explanation (3) about atom kernels with electron as mediator: this is in fact a normal entanglement via magnetic forces, one have 2 atom kernels which have to little magnetic forces to entangle their spins on their own, with the aid of an electron (have 1000 times more magnetic forces) between the 2 atom kernels, the 2 atom kernels get an opposite spin, but if you would increase the distance the entanglement would be ended, this is at (1) not the case under the right circumstances, and (1) is also more specially because of the time 0 connection
-own conclusions (4): I find that one a little forced want to compare (3) with (1), I think personally one have discovered by coincidence the mysterious possibilities of light the last 20 years, therefore also discovered the time 0 “signal”, these possibilities with light were not known originally in the Quantum Mechanics, but I have first to study more details for the time being to form a better opinion
-(own thought) maybe is an elementary particle in a superposition as a kind of halfway form from the entangled time 0 “signal” with information in the invisible universe and appearance of material in the visible universe
-(own thought) general particles have quantum mechanical properties, purely information when invisible (possibly only the elementary particles can be invisible sometimes), otherwise these purely information have transformed to a visible form, but the properties (information) are of course still there and can be even changed. Light have a service for the materials and therefore must being always faster. I think that light always as well in purely informative form available is and you can see this as the local time 0, as at the same time transformed to the visible form (when visible). Because of that purely informative form it can pick up properties and pass through (via emission and absorption) between particles. And because of that purely informative form can it create connections between two particles for exchanging information (entanglement). Information don’t undergo resistance for which it can be exchanged immediately (time 0). I am curious now if I during my self-studies (Quantum Mechanics) do end in another vision!

6.1 Have the time 0 “signal” a time 0 or an unlimited great speed, and do we live in a programmed world, we can never understand it completely, it is most logical there must be more (own thoughts)?

If it would be an unlimited great speed, that mean there would be existing a second layer of resistance in our universe. In the first layer we have the Higgs fields and the maximum speed of light.

Everything is possible of course, but it seems not logically to me. The Higgs fields arrange the speed of materials and light (existing out of particles). The Quantum Mechanical properties which are exchanged between particles in the form of information, is probably a yet new to discover phenomena in Physics what have nothing to do with particles. Therefore these information shall probably sent with time 0, so immediately as the maximum speed of materials and light can be stand firm because time 0 is no speed. So no contradiction. The ERP paradox from Einstein have no time involved, so it fits to this paradox.

So these information can be exchanged by an entangled connection, or being transferred by light, or elementary particles can be relocated with the aid of these information. So to disappear on 1 location and again to appear in another location, also the same elementary particle can appear on more locations at the same time through duplicated information.

So it is clearly, these information have used everywhere in our universe which is 1 big energy field, to let originating an elementary particle (photons, electrons etc.). There originate a wave in a field which 1:1 is connected with a particle. In this state it undergoes resistance from the Higgs fields (not in purely information form).

So through our universe flow an enormous amount of information which give the materials a shape. These information have duplicated but is ever arrived in our universe e.g. during the Big Bang and come possibly from another universe where again also time exist. These universes can’t overlap each other , so it is still not necessary to get extra dimensions for this explanation (personally also not believing in).

So it seems of all have programmed, it is also the question of founding’s of dinosaur and from humans in the past are authentically or to mislead us. Nothing can be ruled out (I am absolutely not religious, it are only open thoughts) unlike you like it very much to believe in coincidence (you are sure for 100%, also the tunnel when dying) and getting no headache further and just can continue with the daily bombarding throughout the centuries because you are not been called to account (you think) and you know for sure after all your colonializations throughout the centuries with all what you have done, being on the good track (because everybody of your own group confirms that day after day, I point me to a group of countries so not specifically one country, this is really the best way for a better world, century after century, preferable against enemies you know before they haven’t weapons to harm you, preferable completely automatically (meanwhile you can drink thea at home far away and safely) and constantly “errors” here and there which nobody care because you are so busy in a good way, and because you find this so very important you spend into some war airplanes 1 milliard (billion) each with public funds because they accept that in a democratic country without problems or slowly changing a little bit to a dictatorship .. is it not the time finally to do it all with more intellect via the UN together ..)!

We can in fact only establish relations or connections via physical laws in Physics, but we shall never understand it deeper because it is also not to understand. On every level there are always again new questions to ask.

For me is it therefore the most logical there must be more, precisely because it shall never be to understand, that must have a goal, that can’t be a coincidence!

You have to open your mind for other thoughts about our existence otherwise you stay hanging on the same level and don't you feel the urge for improvements in the world to make it nicer "together". Even the fear for death shall decrease because of that. If we really would corporate "together" in the UN, e.g. the conflicts in the Middle East would not be that worse and the privacy in our networks was still guaranteed, also many little countries can be big, now everybody still act out of fear yet because the bigger powerfully countries can be unpredictable through sick dominance (they see the world as a competition with all consequences therefore and shoot then and now passengers airplanes out of the sky, e.g. in 1988 and 2014)! Therefore many don't believe in the UN (but we also do nothing for it), but the idea is beautifully and the only way to come to a good and justified world but then it have to be really a democratic and powerfully organization and not a pretended democratic and week organization for which still is valid yet "the bold possesses the world" because of the strong qualities "dominance" and "hidden agendas" in humans from nature (or do you have the naïve idea there have being acting from "goodness")! There is a great difference between "to improve our world" or "to dominate"!

Robotization: the first sex robot, everybody have fun about it. I think immediately to my childhood when everybody was laughing about climate change and overpopulation, that will be ok in time were the most thinking. I see this simple sex robot as a marketing trick to break through a trend and to introduce the human robot in our society silently (of course to make so much possible money with it thoughtlessly). There is no much phantasy necessary to see that a fight competition will start to improve that robot and being lesser simple in the next decades, for sure in other areas. Before you know many jobs will be replaced inspired by thoughtless people who see these as costs savings. Are we only here on Earth to find a way to replace ourselves, in fact insane? The prosperity is just there for 50 years, we become more and more harder for each other because of that prosperity .. why do we take the pleasure so down in our lives .. you would think it looks a disease .. I hope that the inhabitants of our planet go to see the advantages finally from a good functioning UN because the long future does not bring that good otherwise (e.g. there can be existing 2 groups of people, the little group with work and a greater group without work, in 2050 we have 10 milliard or billion of people, do you see the problems already)! Mostly is our opinion after the facts! The problem is also that live is too short, one undergo mostly no trouble of the own decisions, only a next generation! It seems also as if the world suffer from a form of autism, somewhere we know all what is fatal for us, but still we do it, how very badly it will be for us (or next generation) in the future! Life is a learning process, but it seems constantly again if we learn nothing from the past. As soon somebody have been prosperous, that somebody is only busy with themselves and blind or careless for problems in the future (than don’t take children please)!

Let we in the EU lure us in a war and how to prevent this: I have personally the idea that specified persons in the world are being busy for some time in the EU to cause a war with Russia (while they monitor from far and safe) but until now not succeeded happily. The dangerous incident with the shot down Russian jet-fighter was according my personal opinion 100% precooked to be drawn Russia, this can never been a decision from Turkey themselves. There have to be just something going wrong and the NATO have be so-called attacked. What have we to do in such case? Immediately to send home all the parliaments/presidents/prime ministers in the whole EU and to start new elections. Why? Because they have proved in that case not to be smart / trustable enough (or too narcissistic) to represent us. We people / population are the bosses in a “democracy(?)”!! Don’t step in this stupid trap, it was not the first and not the last!! Some rulers are masters in mixing of cause and consequence that the most of us loose the way and being brave followers. The punishment following after is chaos in the world century after century, and always is the other the villain, one refuses to look into a mirror!

7.0 Last thought for which the text on this page must be updated


I started this subject in 2011, I have the idea now in October 2015 to be ready with this subject, my thoughts are based on hard facts, to think more by myself is difficult in house, I think, the rest is long research and again long research by scientists, but it gives much more hope in this black/white world where a lot of modern people think there can only exist something if it rains gold every day, but you don't have to work on things by yourselves, only you or your group of people is important ..

But because I am curious now to the theory of the Quantum Mechanics which predicted this all, I am curious about in which part of this theory “totally no resistance” have sneaked into. So I am going to read globally in between (but not enough time) without to be busy with many formulas .. bought "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by Griffiths, David J.", "Principles of Quantum Mechanics by Shankar R.", "The Principles of Quantum Mechanics by Dirac P.", "Basic Training in Mathematics: A Fitness Program for Science Students by Shankar R." (to refresh some Mathematics from a long time ago) and "The Fabric of the Cosmos by Brian Green" .. so enough "exciting" books hopefully to link possibly the principles of Quantum Mechanics to my own thoughts ..

Here a link to a very interested subject with another view on reality, Holographic Universe, copy link : "https://www.wanttoknow.info/science_spirituality_hologram"! Why this link, it is very clear described!

So this was it ...

Only this short insertion "From Einstein to The United Nations" in the top of this page have been translated in the next languages by volunteers, click on a country flag which represents a language (so not all countries are visible):

(the idea of this project is to spread a thought in Physics but also to spread thoughts about the UN, both coupled, both alone are not strong enough, it is just a way to bring a thought to people, there is more, to give more power/reasons to improve our world as a group and not to think only at yourself, finally this will end in nothing)

(I could not find volunteers for Chinese, Japanese, Arabic and Russian, so I paid for the translation in India (but based by somebody in the USA I think) and was scammed, wrong translations on purpose (but .. money returned finally via Paypal), I was also scammed with a Physics book in India (but .. money returned finally via Paypal), when I found a new translator, again wrong translated on purpose (but nothing paid yet), so be carefully to do business out of your country over the internet, maybe (or for sure) it have to do with my subject (problems with my website sometimes and looking around in my computer / mobile telephone, many tools like virusscanners etc. don’t help, they visit you when they want, but we had never protests against this brutality, others control us), when you start such initiatives you can get a better view on reality around you (a funny world) but it gives me more energy ! So for now I am busy finally only for paid Russian and Chinese sworn translations (but even paid is also difficult for some languages). I see now (not writing what I really think / experienced) when you want to start an UN initiative, you need sponsoring for sworn local translations!)

简体中文 (Chinese Simplified) Français (French) Deutsch (German) Eλληνικά (Greek) Italiano (Italian) Português (Portuguese) Español (Spanish) Русский (Russian) Türkçe (Turkish)
If you think something can be better translated, report to the webmaster please! Except for Dutch, English and German I am not responsible for the contents of the translations!