Easy / simple explanation of Einstein's Theory of Relativity (1)


Nederlands (Dutch) English (Engels)


"From Einstein To The United Nations"

Easy / simple explanation of Einstein's Theory of Relativity / time dilation / length contraction / speed of light / resistance / Quantum Mechanics (1)


(15/05/17) I think I understand suddenly why possibly the Big Bang have been happened (search on 15/05/17 in this webpage)! Energy is probably also an emergent property! Scroll down please and the easy / simple descripion about Einstein's Theory of Relativity, Quantum Mechanics and more starts (a.o. the easy / simple explanation about gravitational force, but is no force, and how a clock can be running slower, see 2.7, or my thought that energy (as a kind of physical power source) don't need to exist really, or Higgs fields don't need to exist really (within our dimensions), see 6.0)! Or my last new thought (15/2/17): an idea model for the entanglement of particles (see 0.1)! The fourth dimension can be the solution for the Theory of Relativity and the Quantum Mechanics! (07/05/17) And a possible reason why one detects an elementary particle in superposition on two locations! Because of too long text, the explanation has been divided in 2 webpages. Since 2011 busy with these subjects. On the first webpage, you find my latest thoughts, on the second webpage how I came to these thoughts in my way. Especially in these kinds of subjects you have to grow (and to study, and above all to keep going on) and that goes slow!

In this website I have my own thoughts, through a physics (individual) study about the Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics I try to find out if these thoughts or nonsense or not (so, just the other way, first studying and then trying to get new thoughts)! Is everything a coincidence (so, "something" exists forever without beginning and reason) of do we overlook something (and/or are we not smart enough yet)? Why is this insight so important in our lives? For setting the future on the right track for the next generations ..

What history (22/2/17). Maybe interesting too to write how such subjects as mine are to find via search engines. Via Bing (so, also Yahoo etc.) am I to find in many ways with keywords, as well the Einstein as the United Nations pages. Years ago, I was in Google number 1 (internationally) with my Einstein page because I was using the word simple, no one dares to use that word then. Then others were going to use that word also in combination with Einstein and after 1 year or so, the index of my page was going down to page 4, currently I am not to find any more on Google, visitors of my page are primarily the ones who are calling my page directly. But in Dutch never problems experienced. But in fact, is that enough for me because I find the Netherlands having a high level in physics, so would my (not common) thoughts be read sometimes, is that enough for me to reach others (meanwhile I study enthusiast near my work and can I analyze my thoughts better and better, but that costs time, so 1-2 years yet), so internationally I can't reach people anymore (but still via Bing, so Yahoo etc.). I had also much problems with my United Nations page, the exact title was in Google always to find on page 2 so as if that page was not existing, then I placed quotes around that title and now you don't find that title anymore without the quotes (which nobody knows, but now it seems to work again!?). So, I had given up to change that all continuously. Google is powerfully and has a mechanism to characterize a page to nonsense and are difficult to find afterwards. Maybe are readers also curiously how much emails I received from the world after years, while readers of the social media are not shy to give their opinion, only 1 (but positive and from The Netherlands) and 1 angry telephone call from a specific country far away! My email address is to find on my home page and then you get guaranteed a lot of spam, how much spam have I received after years, just 0 (normally this must make you happy, statistically you should think something is not right)! This was one of the many illusions we all have in our lives .. it seems me very difficult to get people worldwide so far they have the power together (everybody have literally another opinion, even on country level, the why of that is also an analysis worth, groups of people with many similar opinions can't cooperate with each other yet, except if greediness is the common denominator) .. in fairness, I had try this once more 15 years ago, in about 25 languages (all volunteers), then I sent also emails in 25 languages (now not 1 email sent, that would be seen now as spam), more reactions from the world than just 1 (always trustable?) but it was still on a small scale (also Pentagon and NAVO were visiting my website, one can have been learned what a power media could have, this time I have nothing analyzed).. the night on my balcony on Jan. 2015 (time 0) was the trigger to try it once more .. but I still believe this can be achieved by the new generation (see UN page) via the social media and/or the ordinary letterbox, in fact, it is very simple, we people (not a few politicians) are the boss about our planet (you must think big, otherwise there happens nothing, then you are just too late) .. think to the story of the 1000 buffalos who look apathetic how 1 buffalo is being catch by a few lions, because they don't know their combined force or daring to use it .. and yet it is one time filmed in a Dutch documentary from Bert Haanstra that the buffalos are going together to the lions who are leaving with their tails between their legs, so it is possible .. (07/03/17) I am very happy that WikiLeaks exists! All and everybody is being misused, the breeding ground is 1 big obsession. Therefore, is a UN without veto rights (and with a military force on world level) so important to turn this finally in the good direction what is good for everybody and peace in the world (yet these processes are going slow). If you believe in nothing, nothing changes! And think to the fact that the most people on earth are not obsessed with power and just wish an ordinary satisfied live!

Table of contents: (show / hide, click on number of section)


0.1  Remarks
0.2  Short insertion "From Einstein To The United Nations" (there exist an invisible universe with time 0)
0.3  Introduction

1.1  Short summary (for whom is in hurry, in 2.1 starts the longer version, meanwhile both equally in length)
1.2  Examples
1.3  Resistance
1.3a  Speed of light always measured constantly, made clearly visible (own thought)
1.4  Time Travelling
1.5  Summarised and personal thought (most logical I think)
1.6  E = m.c²
1.7  Thinking in more dimensions (> 3)

2.1  General
2.2  Time and distances (space)
2.3  Time dilation
2.4  Length contraction
2.5  Relativity
2.6  Symmetry and simultaneity
2.7  Easy / simple explanation about gravitational force (but is no force) and how a clock can be running slower
2.8  Gravitational waves

3.0  My own thoughts about our universe (why the speed of light is always constant, follow a curved path because of the gravitational "force" or the Higgs fields, why particles can be on 2 places at the same time, possibly direct communication with everyone and anything in our universe etc., the existance of an invisible universe with time 0 near the visible universe but Einstein is still valid, photons which pass the time 0 + summarized in an overall picture)

4.0  Parallel worlds and own opinion

5.0  Quantum Mechanics and own opinion

6.0  Conclusion: My own hypotheses (Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics)
6.1  Have the time 0 “signal” a time 0 or an unlimited great speed, and do we live in a programmed world, we can never understand it completely, it is most logical there must be more (own thoughts)?

7.0  Last thought for which the text on this page must be updated

0.1  Remarks

    Inside this text box I write only new thoughts, nothing updated in the rest of this webpage since 18/4/16, after my studies I go to write more again .. but in part 2 of this webpage you can follow how I came to these thoughts in my way .. below within this box I describe for myself my general idea about everything until now ..

  • New thought (15/2/17) In fact, I came to this thought through thinking about the complex numbers. The numbers by which we do our calculations in daily life are a subset of the complex numbers, we as ordinary people do our calculations in fact in 1 dimension. With the aid of the complex numbers there can be calculated in more dimensions e.g. the motion of an airplane. A complex number is nothing more than a vector for which you can do calculations in geometric models. Technically / scientifically fellow human beings do understand this better because they have studied complex numbers. In fact I did not believe in more than 3 dimensions I wrote once in this website, but I think now different.
    Example entanglement in 1 dimension

    Figure 0.2A Example entanglement in 1 dimension
    The invisible universe about I write, is nothing more than de fourth dimension as I think (see also "Possibly interesting"). The fourth dimension can be the solution for the Theory of Relativity and the Quantum Mechanics! We live (locked in) in 3 dimensions and can’t never go to the fourth dimension (alive ), but to influence is possible I think because we are part of it. The information about I write in the invisible universe and others write, is something abstracts in the fourth dimension. Than everything just falls into place. Also my thought that energy do not exists really as a kind of physical power source and the Higgs fields do not need to exist really also. E.g. space and time do not need to exist in the microworld for us in 3 dimensions, but the related information do in the fourth dimension, if you can express that information in vectors in the fourth dimension, is it possible for example to show up the emergent "gravitational force" from Erik Verlinde (see next subject) as a result in the third dimension for structures. Or think for example to the entanglement of particles. In figure 0.2A I have imagine an example with vectors of an entangled connection between 2 particles if there was only existing 1 dimension for us, to make it better to understand. So, in the first dimension (the straight line) there are two entangled particles for which the properties all the time are opposite through that entanglement. That connection has been described in the second dimension (the surface). There you see two opposite vectors for a property which are always and totally zero. How far the particles go in our time, the vectors in the second dimension change immediately but the property vectors stay the same in this example model, changes in properties are also immediately reflected, therefore is the connection timeless (time 0). It seems that light has the ability that two particles models can be connected to each other in the higher dimension. In the same way there can be vectors for the visibility of a particle in a group, for a specific value in the second dimension disappears the particle (temporary) in the first dimension, if this could be possible also for structures like objects or a human being in the fourth dimension is the question. In the same way there is also a vector for a particle of light (photon) and each other elementary particle in the fourth dimension etc. etc. What is than that fourth dimension? If that dimension exist than there could be existing more universes with worlds (but don't need to be, even if it is possible). Even there exist no space and time in the fourth dimension (as we experience), the mathematics just continues (maybe only for us)! This conclusion of myself is nothing special because science thinks already in this way for a long time, but for me it is going to being clear too via logical thinking! I think as long as we don't understand it (I think never), it will be again a coincidence .. sometimes it looks that everything we fantasy in science fictions has been partly really possible to keep us busy .. Possibly interesting: it are all just thoughts which can be removed again later, but it keeps me busy for a while. I see just now that everything is symmetric in my example, totally zero. If it is in 1 dimension symmetric (the properties), then the model must be symmetric in a higher dimension, so totally zero again. If you would know everything, the reality is complex of course, then there is possibly exactly 1 symmetric model which makes it right. But totally zero. Is a higher dimension a real dimension if all is totally zero, than it could be any dimension. Could our world / universe (three dimensions) be just existing because all is totally zero too, but space and time exist also. Could the entanglement of particles just being a situation for which the total of parts, which explain that entanglement, in the model is zero (even when totally all is zero in our world / universe, in all parts need totally not to be zero of course)? Than is the fourth dimension not real, but the zero stands for nothing. Could the parts of that model in the fourth dimension being called information (compare with example, first and second dimension)? But in fact, is the fourth dimension just as strange or not strange as the first and second dimension. In the first and second dimension exist also only imaginary mathematics vectors (that long arrows) because objects have always a volume, there don't exist flat objects without a volume. Also, measurements are possible only in the third dimension. Not all physically variables can be expressed as vectors (and so added etc.). E.g. velocities can be expressed as vectors in our world, but thanks to the Theory of Relativity is this not true anymore for very big speeds. The reality will be more and more complex in this way (for us). But because there exists no time in the fourth dimension, there don't exist something like velocity, but is a result of many vectors like the resistance (see part 2), and seems velocity to be a vector under low speeds. I am very curious to my image formation after years of studying later, very interesting! One argues often in physics (e.g. the String Theory which I don’t know) about rolled-up dimensions somewhere in the universe, personally I find that a strange image, a higher dimension can never be a part of a lower dimension. I think that such higher dimension just nothing is around us .. where no space and time exists as we experience .. welcome in the world we don't understand, then it must be a coincidence .. In fact, I find the thought of coincidence too simplistic for words. Personally, I am 100% convinced that behind everything is a plan, more I don’t know either of course. I found it comical that one in physics thought in the past that the model of everything was almost complete. But ok, that would be possible but only expressed in connections and relations etc., not more than that. I think e.g. that the fourth dimension only exists because our universe and time exist in the third dimension. Without that universe and time there would be nothing in the model. E.g. where could a vector have its origin in the fourth dimension? But it is well imaginable, that everything have been started from 1 point, the model of everything was started! An elementary particle in superposition is on 2 locations at the same time. I don't know exactly all about it, but was reading in the magazine EOS that one in Leiden (NL) in the physics laboratories can already reach a temperature of .001 above 0 degrees Kelvin, or the so called absolute null point. Under this temperature it is not difficult to bring an elementary particle in a so called superposition (almost no motion anymore, so no photon, is a particle of light) by which it is on 2 locations at the same time. The decision on which location it is definite, is not taken yet by nature, when one looks to it (so the influence of light) then the definite location have been chosen. This also relates to my thoughts again about the fourth dimension in which everything is totally zero in the complete model. The equipment detects the particle on 2 locations, so it seems 2 particles with each the energy of 1 particle. But a particle has only 1x the amount of energy. So, it seems that energy have been presented by a kind of vector in the fourth dimension and energy not a real kind of physical power source is, but more a number. When the location is definite, there is a counterpart active in the model (existing out of vectors) which again makes everything zero. And just as the speed of light can never be reach by materials, in the same way can the absolute null point never be reached, always just above. The local times zero of the elementary particles (see next subject) as I think, are purely vectors in the fourth dimension (time 0). The idea of others that the world and universe are a kind of hologram find I personally not so strange, a hologram is a three dimensional image by light from a two dimensional surface, but (26/3/17) I think that our world and universe are a projection from the fourth dimension, a kind of hologram but than materialized. But the whole is being corrected by as well as the fourth and third dimension with what we are doing. You can't walk through everything thanks to a very complex model of vectors in the fourth dimension for which every vector has its own effect in the third dimension and we absolute don't understand it at all (but have discovered it, and by studying it all we learn to use it in daily live)! Compare it a little bit with the new hologram dashboard in some cars for which it feels to push on a real button. (02/05/17) Numbers as energy as I think can also be made visible as vectors in the first dimension (if the algorithm satisfies) and so being a projection from the fourth dimension (or other dimensions). The algorithm for different kind of vectors can maybe even different (and per dimension). E.g. vectors from the third dimension are addable according the known algorithm, but a vector in the first dimension has only 2 directions and a length equally to the (positive) number and so addable only in that way. So, an energy vector can't be treated as a vector from the third dimension and even its location can’t be determined exactly in the third dimension. So, energy belonging to an elementary particle (and the particle itself) can be a projection from the fourth dimension (with the local time 0). (05/05/17) I think that emergent properties (properties only valid for structures) don't exist in the fourth dimension, but only in lower dimensions. Emergent properties are e.g. time (exists for structures of elementary particles), space (exists for structures of quanta), temperature (exists for structures of particles), "gravitational force" (but is no force, exists for structures of elementary particles, see next subject, time caused by "gravitational force") etc. Then as always comes that doubt if you need the fourth dimension for time 0 for the elementary particles. Also without the fourth dimension (because you don't know everything yet) there wouldn't be existing time or resistance on elementary level, but in structures. But because everything did originate from 1 point (Big Bang) is it very logically to think at a fourth dimension which did originate everything. (07/05/17) Big Bang logically! How the Big Bang have been originated, nobody shall have an explanation for that I think. But on the moment of the Big Bang, it has been started I think not with 1 space unit (quantum) because of the emergent property of space, but e.g. 8. This expansion has a speed and because from the beginning all physical laws from now must be valid, there is no reason to think why this must stop (or maybe there is also an enddate for the universe), so because of that the continued expansion of the universe. Time and "gravitational force" are also emergent properties. So the local time of the elementary particles is 0, (isolated) particles of light (photons, don’t have a mass) have no resistance and therefore always the maximum speed for the observer (speed of light). How is this for the other isolated elementary particles with the local time 0 (e.g. electrons)? There don’t exist also "gravitational force" or resistance for that particles, only for a group (so at least 2). So, an isolated particle would be having also the speed of light. (07/05/17) Is this maybe the reason one detects such elementary particle (with mass) in superposition on two locations (then it undergoes resistance or time), and when one looks to it (influence of light) it has been becoming part of a group (from the environment)? In superposition it has been separated from the group? Now I have read somewhere (exact information from experiments difficult to get) that even atoms and molecules can be brought into a superposition, that means in my thought then, that the local time 0 is on the level of an isolated molecule. That would be possible, finally is time an emergent property and so time don't exist on an isolated molecule level but only in a group. (15/05/17) Would "gravitational force" (or resistance, so time) just being generated through motion? If you read Maxwell how electromagnetic waves (is light) have been generated through the motion of static charge through an electric field which generates a magnetic field, then I get immediately the thought that just as energy an electric field doesn’t exist really, but only expresses a relation so that we can explain a phenomenon in our way, but it in fact is the fourth dimension which do originate things. It is just looking in another way to the world around you. Also, immediately a thought is coming up that "gravitational force" (or resistance, so time) is just being generated through motion of materials, so an emergent property and controlled through the fourth dimension. Our Earth is as just as all around us in motion through the universe. Therefore, is the dilation in the new local time of materials in motion independent from the beginning velocity, but only from the new difference in velocity (relativity). Possibly are also gravitational waves generated when materials accelerated which are not measurable. But ok after reading I get more insight again. And now suddenly I think to understand the Big Bang, without the Big Bang the local time would be always 0 according the laws of physics. If the local time of materials (structures of particles) would be 0 just as for light (as in the point of the Big Bang, time 0), all materials in the third dimension would be in motion with the speed of light only. Through starting all materials in motion from the beginning, is the local time from that materials from the beginning not equal to 0 and are after, any velocities for that materials possible. So, for making diverse motions with any velocities possible for all materials, it is a must that all materials must be in motion from the beginning! So, the only reason for the Big Bang is (as I think of course) that without, our universe couldn’t exist! If this thought is true (what I think), then again has been proved that physics can be simple (once one know of course)! Often are these old thoughts written in the second webpage, but suddenly becomes it clear, in this way work thinking processes probably. If somebody would think, so if you decrease the speed of that motion you come back in the point time 0, no unfortunately, that is the Theory of Relativity, time can go only slower but never being 0 again. Only light has the local time 0 because it doesn't undergo resistance (is time or "gravitational force")! And maybe one think already in this way for a long time, I follow only my own thoughts for the moment and don't check this all unless I read this accidently in a magazine or read it in books (I am still busy with mathematics but almost ready now, so now it is going to be exciting)! I wonder me every day that the most scientists only believe in coincidences. I hope somebody picks up this new thought! (21/5/17) In fact, fits these all completely to my thoughts. Energy is also an emergent property. During the Big Bang all materials (structures of particles) have been getting at once (without transition) time, mass and energy. (Elementary) particles have no time, mass and energy, only grouped in a structure. (Elementary) particles come from the fourth dimension in which no time, mass and energy exist, but are projections in the third dimension. I think also that one in physics can never isolate completely 1 elementary particle, only as part of a group, in superposition is probably a floating situation but not completely isolated. At entanglement two particles can be connected with each other timeless. I hope that Eric Verlinde (Dutch physicist) now slowly goes to believe in the Big Bang.
    (28/6/17) When reading Maxwell, the thought came up at me that the electromagnetic wave has been found in a very simple way, like if this must have to be found, this wave has been brought many new technological developments like radio, television etc. Maxwell had found the formulas for the relations between electric and magnetic fields for charged particles. Then he found when he removed the charged particles form the formulas (so made 0), the formula originated for the electromagnetic wave in free space (is space without charged particles), so the proof that there must exist an electromagnetic wave which can move undisturbed through space around us. Unbelievable found in a simple way (light is also an electromagnetic wave)!
  • SCIENTIFICALLY BREAKTHROUGH POSSIBLY (19/11/16 still nothing updated in this webpage since 18/4/16, I try to bundle all my thoughts from my website in this little piece of text, and only related to this subject). The explanation about the new theory from Erik Verlinde (Dutch) (emergent "gravitational force", “gravitational force” exists only for a group of elementary particles, in a structure, so materials, but not for 1 elementary particle alone, possibly a finetuning of Einstein which was again a finetuning of Newton; daring to think distinctive) have being explained excellent (also for not physicists) in copy link: "http://www.quantumuniverse.nl/emergent-gravity-and-dark-universe"! So that “gravitational force” exists here through the movement of information. (my opinion in general, so not related to this discovery possibly:) The physical science approaches more and more its boundaries, to think not distinctive (bolt and nut theories) is not enough anymore, possibly and hopefully leads this thinking to a good understanding about our existence and so, to a future for which everything is going better in this world finally! The problem of science is in fact also, how more we discover (while we yet still not much and can't understand), how louder scientists call that everything is a coincidence. Now we are going to understand a little bit of our brains (while we yet still not much and can't understand), there is already a conclusion that we are a kind of robots, so robots who discover by their selves that they are a robot! These all feed of course the superficiality of our time that you above all must be busy with your own, because in fact nothing has a real meaning anymore (as long as it does not harm your own interests, personally I see the human body as a kind of tool which can have defects, but not stands completely on its own). It is above all the task of science not to work with gut feelings, and at least to admit "we don’t know it either" if one haven't enough knowledge! (these gut feelings originate often from personal disappointments, but as you are is the other too, many problems in the world are caused by ourselves, as I see it. It seems how more one undergoes prosperity, how more personal disappointments.)
    Now many would ask what is than that information? I think a proportional relation with something you can formulate as a factor for a mathematical formula (if you succeed) but not exactly knows what it is (and possibly never knows) .. in this case is that information related to the volume of total space with dark energy, and the volume of some materials in the universe (so not all materials in the universe) which transfers some volume with dark energy to that materials .. In fact, all is information, e.g. also the temperature, but as long you can’t specify it more concrete you call it information for the time being.
    My own thoughts: Meanwhile I think much about the comments of Erik Verlinde and compare it with my own thoughts of course (with much lesser detailed physically knowledge of course) which I modify when necessary (but only in this piece of text from 19/11/16, because I go continuing to write more again after my studies).
    What are that thoughts than from this webpage (and are to find in this webpage), able to follow the rest in this text better? I believe in an invisible universe with time 0 (so timeless) from which information is passing through or is being exchanged to the visible universe to giving materials an appearance. E.g. for the entanglement of elementary particles, which is timeless (time 0) as I think, the invisible universe has been used to exchange information between these particles in the visible universe. I believe that the local time of elementary particles of light (called photons) 0 is, and that particles have the property (near all other special properties) to create such an entangled connection via the invisible universe because of that local time 0. I believe that a particle of light (photon) is being there as well in the invisible universe (as information) as in the visible universe. I believe in the (disturbed) Higgs fields which gives a resistance to all materials and forms the concept time. I believe that that particles of light don’t undergo resistance and have through the structure of space (possibly also arranged by the Higgs fields) the maximum speed, calling the speed of light. I believe that the other elementary particles or being in the invisible universe as information, or being in the visible universe, so they can disappear to the invisible universe and appear again after a while. Also, I made the remarks it could be possible that the Theory of Relativity is only valid for structures (materials) (e.g. "the gravitational force" could be existing only for structures but not on the level of the elementary particles, that seems be to bring mathematically problems with the Theory of Relativity). And I believe also that our measuring equipment can only measure in the visible universe (so everything is 0 in the invisible universe). It are just all thoughts which can never be described exactly through the abstract character. The Quantum Mechanics have not changed much in the last 100 years.
    Which of these thoughts connect to the new theory of Erik Verlinde, as I see it, and what is new?
    Universe in 2 layers

    Figure 0.1 (universe in 2 layers, see this in 3D)
    The universe exists according a new view in physics and new for me, as an abstract network with little units, called quantum units, filled with dark energy and entangled with each other (so one side of the universe knows the other side). According Erik Verlinde space and time do not exist on that level of quantum units (new), so also not on the level of elementary particles (have also the size of quantum units), but bundled in structures they form space and time, so emergent properties. So, this could mean that the Theory of Relativity is not applicable on elementary level (microscopic), but only on macroscopic level but also for the bundled structures of quantum units (space) or elementary particles (materials). This could make the Quantum Mechanics right again. So that quantum units are timeless, they are entangled, so they form as first layer the invisible universe with time 0 in my thoughts. The next layer is dark energy in my thoughts and forms the visible universe. The visible universe has been controlled by the invisible universe (mathematically seen you could imagine a space quantum unit as a vector, a space quantum unit completely on its own as a null vector, entangled space quantum units as a sum of these null vectors so still a null vector, not entangled space quantum units as the sum of vectors of the separated space quantum units which are no null vectors anymore because of the bundling, see figure 0.1). Materials are there in the second layer and light in both layers. The effects from that invisible universe plus dark energy are the (disturbed) Higgs fields (must have a name) about I write all the time (the Higgs fields, (new) so now the consequence of emergent "gravitational force" and mass inertia, both related to information from that abstract network plus dark energy, the resistance about I write all the time). The Higgs particles have still a meaning yet in these thoughts, because the formulas of Erik Verlinde include mass. Because you can argument emergent "gravitational force" and mass inertia (apparently), but dark energy possibly also never detectable is, suddenly you see an elementary particle arising spontaneously (made of dark energy) and that's it, is it all information out of nothing! Welcome in the world of the mysterious Quantum Mechanics! Near the emergent “gravitational force” is also new in the theory of Erik Verlinde that elementary particles must have the local time 0 just as the elementary particles of light (called photons). In fact logically because you can’t create a clock of (or within) 1 elementary particle, so you can’t measure time (no, also not with a particle of light, called a photon, that is our time and not the local time). So all the elementary particles must exist in my thoughts as well as information in the invisible universe as in the visible universe. You should almost going to think that the invisible universe absolute is and the visible world relative, time exists only for the observer. So the local time of the elementary particles is 0, the entanglement is also timeless, so the whole happens in time 0 or timeless in the invisible universe. Information have been used for the visible universe. So, I think that abstract network with time 0 has the function to exchange information or passing through to the visible universe. E.g. during the entanglement information have been exchanged via that network in the invisible universe (without dark energy) to the visible universe (with dark energy or materials). Yet 1 comments: would the curving of space being caused because dark energy have been taken away there? In an accelerated rocket somewhere in space far from the big masses happens the same according the so called principle of equivalence from Einstein, so there is no dark energy been taken away, so I think it has to do with disturbed Higgs fields! Some new thoughts (26/12/16): when you are busy with these kind of subjects, often they continue in your brains in the background while you are busy with other things to do, even during your sleep, at some moments there arise new thoughts which do not need to be true of course, but possibly can give new ideas, so have to try this out. I still have not read much except mathematics through the lack of time, that will be a new resolution for 2017 (but I am going to get far with that this year, the enthusiasm is very tremendously, I never give up!!). I think that in that abstract network with time 0 in the invisible universe, the totally quantity of information is always be zero. Think e.g. to two entangled particles which have each opposite properties because of that entanglement e.g. their spin. So, I can imagine that the emergent "gravitational force" the proportional opposite information is from a specified kind of information in the "empty" universe with dark energy. If all the other emergent "gravitational forces" like around the Earth stay equally unless the new formed materials at the edge of our universe, this would be an explanation for the extension of our universe. The proportion "empty" universe with dark energy and materials within that universe would be constant possibly. So, the Big Bang has started possibly out of nothing (with other words science is limited consciously). Would you ever that abstract network using for immediate communication with other worlds, then you would vary a specified kind of information according a pattern which can be picked up by another intelligent civilization, so challenges enough in the far future.
    How can the local time of an elementary particle being 0 and also being there in the visible universe? This was already known for light. We see light in our time but the own time (local time) of light is 0, how strange that is. So, also for the other elementary particles. They are possibly only detectable via their information, because forms no space and time, but structured they form objects in the visible universe and is the Theory of Relativity applicable. According a Chinese mathematical research is the motion of an elementary particle alone (so outside a structure) in the Quantum Mechanics no continue motion (discontinue) in the visible universe, a particle is then in one location (quantum unit in that abstract network) and then in the other location, so it is for some time or 0 seconds invisible. So, it’s local time is 0, it exists for some time or 0 seconds only as information. So, elementary particles alone (outside a structure) are as well at the same time in the visible as invisible universe, and possibly only as information detectable in the visible universe. E.g. think at experiments with separated photons. So, e.g. the spin of an elementary particle alone (outside a structure) is only information because a round shape does not exist really because there is no space and time. But elementary particles are mostly already part of a structure like e.g. a current (electrons) through a wire, so difficult to say as I think when an elementary particle can be seen as completely separated. E.g. take a muon, that is also a specific kind of elementary particle that exist for a fixed time (afterwards it disintegrates), how faster it moves how longer the disintegration takes for the observer, so the processes inside go slower, the local (own) time goes slower, so the local time is not 0, so it must be a composed particle, so a structure (I think)! But a muon can again be a part of another structure possibly in the visible universe ..
    How can a quantum unit or elementary particle being timeless but together not in a structure? E.g. if you want to measure a distance you need two points, within 1 point there is no distance (always 0). So, within all points is the distance 0, but with combinations there exist distances. In the same way for space and time, you need minimal 2 quantum units, with 1 quantum unit there exist no space and time (is always 0). So, within all quantum units is space and time 0, but with combinations there exist space and time. Space is clear to understand I guess, for time there must be motion possible, if not possible the time is 0. For motion, you need also at least two quantum units. You must not see Information as a motion, but as something abstracts for which nobody have a theory for the time being!
    What is the difference between an elementary particle of light and another elementary particle? So, for both is the local time 0. Both are there as information in the invisible universe, outside a structure detectable as information in the visible universe, within a structure they have possibly an appearance that give materials a shape (or an appearance as light if they are photons, photons are elementary particles of light). Both can disappear possibly sometimes to the invisible universe as information and not being detectable as information in the visible universe (so now another thought) and some time later again being detectable as information. Within a structure also possible maybe, and for a little while no appearance in the visible universe. Photons can entangle information in the invisible universe between other elementary particles via collisions. Photons are the fast elementary particles. They exchange also energy between the other elementary particles. Photons have the leading role in physics. Photons undergo no resistance in the visible universe, but other elementary particles undergo resistance because of the Higss particle. But that resistance can be seen only in structures, if it has an appearance, outside a structure it is all pure information.
    Why is the speed of light for anybody (in motion) always equally? You can reverse it, and argument that all what is found because of the Theory of Relativity, therefore is the speed of light always the same. Or you can also argument that quantum units can’t being overbridged faster than the speed of light or being observed in the visible universe. Because particles of light (photons) undergo no resistance in contrast to the other elementary particles in the visible universe (so structured), is that speed fixed in the visible universe.
    A black hole (materials transformed to dark energy again? .. but information stored in the horizon, and so reversible ..) is possibly connected with 1 point of that abstract network (time 0). I am curious about the next follow-up theories soon! It would be very miraculously if time 0 could already be proven theoretically in such a short period (since 2015) of years (or is this in fact already done in a black hole?)!
    Would the world going to change or will time 0 (everything is connected) being accepted just as a pile of sandwiches and is all just seen stoical again as a coincidence?

  • (12/05/17) My general idea about everything until now! I describe this primarily for myself and update this during my studies.
    I consider all macro objects (materials) as structures from the microworld for which that macro objects have been becoming an own local time according the Theory of Relativity. I consider time as an emergent property and think that microworld (molecules, atoms etc., called micro objects) has the same local time as the macro object belonging to. That time is being used for all eventually motions in that microworld. A complete isolated micro object (so, not belonging to a macro object) has the local time 0 or is timeless, and there exists also no space within this micro object (space is also an emergent property). This micro object can probably be represented as a collection vectors from the fourth dimension and is something abstracts, and is being projected in the third dimension. Also, space units (quantum units) can be represented in that way as micro objects. Through the Big Bang space is being created and seems the universe being inflated (as a balloon). The same situation as micro objects are making connections with each other, structures originated, macro objects, which also seems to be inflated. Light is an object on its own, and has always the local time 0 (but space is for light also an emergent property). Connections with space units are used for motions. If there no connections can be made anymore with other micro objects (so, under which also space units), motions can't continue their followed path anymore (e.g. in this way one can't walk through a wall of stone). It is very understandable in this abstract way that the third dimension has been started with the Big Bang, micro objects from the fourth dimension with time 0 (so coming from nothing), starting composing structures (macro objects) in this third dimension.
    Macro objects with a local time 0, could only be in motion with the speed of light. Because macro objects must have the possibility to be in motion with different velocities, is the local time of that macro objects from the beginning nonzero. That is, macro objects must be in motion from the beginning (compared with the point time 0 of the Big Bang). This explains the Big Bang! At the Big Bang, macro objects have been becoming time, mass and energy at once, these are all emergent properties, micro objects totally isolated have no time, space, mass and energy. Energy is no physical but an abstract something, a number gotten from the fourth dimension through projection in the third dimension.
    What do I mean exactly with the local time of materials? The speed at which an earth clock runs, positioned on that materials. How faster that materials are in motion through space, how slower that clock runs. The local time of light is zero. A clock runs slower through resistance ("gravitational force", Higgs fields, materials have Higgs particles inside) probably gotten from the fourth dimension. Light has no resistance (no "gravitational force", no Higgs particles inside) and has therefore the maximum speed possible. Because there are no forces in the game, is that speed of light constant. Gravitational waves let the local time vary a little bit, at which one (the observers, can be equipment) length contraction (is nothing more than a visual effect) detects for materials subject to that gravitational waves. The Big Bang have been happened in a point with the local time zero, a black hole has also a point with the local time zero, both are points from the fourth dimension.

  • (7/3/16) Have objects just been somewhat bigger / smaller for a short period with gravitational waves (detected on 14/9/15) or is it just a change in local time for a little moment (see my own thoughts in 2.8)!

  • (18/4/16) Read in 6.0 that the so called Belltest in fact fits in the time 0 entangled connection between particles! You have to learn to think distinctive to understand more (I think)!

  • Read in 3.0 there is probably more existing (just physics, just a new thought), it is hidden in light!

  • The speed of light is the greatest speed in the visible universe .. but not in the invisible universe!

  • To think in quanta of motion (the most little units in nature) is in fact the same as thinking in a visible and invisible universe, so a coincidence (see in 5.0 + evidence quanta used in theory of Quantum Mechanics by Chinese scientists)!

  • Just read (28/4/15) that indeed (as I thought in 3.0) 1 photon is enough to entangle many particles (experiment in March 2015 : thousands of atoms entangled with a single photon, copy link : "http://newsoffice.mit.edu/2015/thousands-atoms-entangled-single-photon-0325"), why don’t see physicists yet the possible connection with the local time 0 of a photon? It is unbelievable that scientists can work on this scale, I would like to see this ever! Is the entanglement of particles a natural function, e.g. for the entangled spins of particles, and is these entanglement by humans an extra entanglement, because the spin is from nature already opposite in situations and is the same channel used for the relocation of elementary particles (so no atoms) in situations (was a radio wave ever also not spooky)? I suppose the measured time is only the time for the spin changing in the visible universe! Yet another interesting copy link (1998) : "http://www.volkskrant.nl/dossier-archief/gedoofd-licht-bestaat-meteen-elders~a458323/" (unfortunately Dutch). Sometimes you can have a right thought without knowing the details (but have not to be right of course), until now I have not read anything that my thought disproves, I only watch it from another corner (without formulas) and can give a result which would be found much later otherwise. All strange effects in the Quantum Mechanics are as I think all effects from a mixed universe without time. It could not be otherwise than that a real physicist know somewhere too that it is all no coincidence (we have the phase of monkey passed)! There is a day coming, we know suddenly much more .. and I hope it will not be only stupid technically but an important step further for the world ..

  • Just much read on Wiki (10/7/15) about that particles present themselves also as a wave and many other interesting things about the Quantum Mechanics. Copy link: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave-particle_duality". Looking to an experiment with particles make the results different in that experiment (watch the double slit experiment). That have of course to do with light (own thought). In the entanglement of particles is indeed no time element involved (click within the page on ERP paradox). Outside our universe is the time 0 (click than on Quantum Entanglement and read Mystery of Time, experiment in 2013). Just before Mystery of Time an explanation is given by physicists for the entanglement of photons by using their local times of 0. The time 0 “signals” are coming closer! If more people think in the same way, it proves only the logic! We have reached the boundaries of science for us!

  • Just read (12/8/15) that Chinese scientist already in 2013 have measured the time of info over an entangled connection, and say indeed it can be instantaneous (immediately), so time 0, nice to see your own thoughts confirmed! Copy link "http://www.livescience.com/27920-quantum-action-faster-than-light.html".

  • A thought. Maybe is our universe 1 big field presenting a different kind of fields at the same time. Nobody knows in fact exactly what is a field. For light an electromagnetic field, for a specific kind of particles another unknown Quantum Field etc. According the Quantum Mechanics are all particles a mix from as well a wave in a field (a wave is a disturbance in a field) as a particle (a little heap of energy). As if the energy below the maximum and minimum from the wave in the field have used for the particle, as if particle and wave are one entity!

  • In 6.0 I am analyzing my own thoughts by studying the Quantum Mechanics (slowly), a last thought (21/12/15) energy don't need to exist really, or Higgs fields don't need to exist really!

0.2  After this short insertion "From Einstein To The United Nations" (between lines) starts the explanation (see also summarized in an overall picture at the end of 3.0; at the bottom of this page you find all the other languages for this insertion):


Last new thought (read in 3.0), there is an invisible universe with time 0 only used in situations by particles and (or through) a "high speed or immediate" signal (the hidden "God's?" channel to communicate immediately with everybody and anything in the universe, at least if one discover how to use, can take ages), and a visible universe (Einstein still valid, particles visible here, the same particle even on more places at the same time, and don't make the mistake in formulas to calculate with the distance in the visible universe while the particle was in the invisible universe) .. this invisible universe with time 0 can't exist on its own, only interwoven with the visible universe .. what qualified physicist dare this thought and writes history if everything is truth (think of Mr. Higgs, follow your own thoughts)? .. if you have contacts in the science world, let them look to this idea .. why is Einstein famous, he was using a fact offered by Lorentz (NL) who did not know what to do with it (it was a “confusing” fact, no theory but a hard fact, how more resistance how slower the time, even time 0, took a long time until acceptance) .. the Quantum Mechanics deliver also “confusing” facts (also no theory but hard facts, no resistance at all, time 0, takes also time for acceptance), where is the physicist like Einstein who transforms that hard facts (typically how the brains can work, I really don’t read much about these subjects because too few time because of my work, but I think much about these subjects outside my work, a part of physics where you can come far with logic, in fact my view on time is fully based on the Lorentz formula, in the night on my balcony on Jan. 2015 smoking a little cigar I got this idea above described suddenly if it was whispered in my ears, I was thinking if there would be a God existing how could he/she controlling the universe with its big distances, a magically moment for myself, but that says nothing of course even it sounds logically, by somewhat reading on the internet covers this idea, what others can have too already, the concept nonlocality in the Quantum Mechanics) .. now I find it myself also being exciting (but not enough time) to discover / read where in the theory “totally no resistance” have sneaked into (or a coincidence?) ..

I have no religious background, I am a humanist. With this possible discovery ever (there is possibly more) the downward spiral from our world can be ended, arrogance and the dominant thought “it goes only about me or my group, about our own self-enrichment, I use my cleverness only for me or my group, this is my only goal in life, after me or my group the deluge, I do everything to reach my goal, via secret means or mass psychology, I give nothing about others in the world but use them only for expanding of power and/or self-enrichment, I want children but have no real interest in their future, to rule over others with own ideas, power is an obsession for me, money is an obsession for me, I don’t rest in my short live before I have just as many money as 10000 people together even it make me not happier and can I do nothing with it etc.”, humans have proven to be able to create everything but somewhere there is no progress. Stimulate the thought to think about the welfare of other people as well as animals, treat both well, stop with primitive behavior and to be cruel (e.g. not throwing living lobsters in boiling oil in the year 2015). Via a strong improved and justified United Nations without veto rights (a world government) and related education (and controlled growth in populations), we can create together a nicer world (by which everybody have to follow the rules of The United Nations for humans and animals e.g. a limitation in personal assets, no exploitation on basic goods as houses, everybody a chance on self-development etc.). Together we are really in a strong position and be able to cope with anything!

This insertion have been translated by myself and checked by volunteer: Régine TEMAM / copy link "http://www.translatorscafe.com/cafe/member211853.htm".


Easy / simple explanation of Einstein's Theory of Relativity (2)



Only this short insertion "From Einstein To The United Nations" in the top of this page have been translated in different languages by volunteers or paid, see at the bottom of this page.

The idea of this project is to spread a thought in physics but also to spread thoughts about the UN, both coupled, both alone are not strong enough, it is just a way to bring a thought to people, there is more, to give more power/reasons to improve our world as a group and not to think only at yourself, finally this will end in nothing.

(I have experienced with my activities via internet that there are existing many fake websites for services which you can’t trust, but keep an eye on the activities of others or in the world in this way. When you want to start an UN initiative, you need sponsoring for sworn local translations, via the internet you have 60% chances your text will be translated wrong on purpose. Also one intrudes into your pc or mobile telephone when one wishes, no virus scanner or other software can prevent this through mentioned build leaks in that kind of software for which one even have to pay.)


If you think something can be better translated, report to the webmaster please! Except for Dutch, English and German I am not responsible for the contents of the translations!